BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 27(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,224Mumbai2,124Bangalore818Chennai747Jaipur453Ahmedabad389Kolkata349Hyderabad316Chandigarh174Indore169Surat126Raipur114Pune113Rajkot109Cochin89Visakhapatnam87Karnataka69Patna66Lucknow64Cuttack63Amritsar56Telangana46Nagpur46Agra44Guwahati42Allahabad42Dehradun28Ranchi25SC24Panaji18Orissa11Jodhpur11Calcutta6Rajasthan4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Jabalpur1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 1483Section 65(1)2Addition to Income2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

D' IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK M/1, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD STRP NO. 08 OF 2022 AND CONNECTED MATTERS 15 BHAVANINAGAR, SUDDAGUNTE PALYA BENGALURU-560 029. REP. BY ITS MANAGER …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. RAVI RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE) THIS STRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 65(1) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX 2003 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.03.2021 PASSED IN STA NOS. 20 TO 22/2019

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MADAN MOHAN GUPTA

ITA/19/2024
HC Rajasthan
14 Aug 2025

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANJEET PUROHIT

Section 147Section 148Section 263

2. The issue itself had arisen in the context of the Assessing Officer [“AO”] having not made any additions in respect of issues which formed subject matter of the notices under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”]. This led to the matter being examined by the Principal Commissioner under Section 263 of the Act and which authority

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

reassessment of such property taxes was made, and the amount of tax to be levied and collected was determined under sub-section (1). The proviso thereto required the Corporation to pay simple interest, at the rate of six percent per annum, on the amount of excess liable to be refunded under Sub-section (2), from the date of the decree

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

D) by LRs & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr3 and Delhi Development Authority v Rajendra Singh & Ors.4 to submit that there should be no discrimination between landowners when land is of similar nature. 18.3.1 It is contended that the acquired land is half a kilometre away from Maharani Bagh and village Jasola is about one kilometre away from village Kilokari