BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 153clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,940Mumbai1,279Chennai527Bangalore517Jaipur263Hyderabad250Kolkata170Chandigarh130Ahmedabad108Pune86Amritsar78Raipur70Guwahati55Indore45Lucknow37Patna37Cochin37Nagpur34Visakhapatnam31Surat31Rajkot27Ranchi27Cuttack23Jodhpur22Dehradun21Allahabad20Karnataka17SC17Panaji14Telangana11Agra5Calcutta5Punjab & Haryana5Orissa4Jabalpur4Rajasthan3Kerala2Gauhati2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 1534Section 42

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. SHRINATH CORPORATION

ITA/68/2024HC Rajasthan08 Oct 2024

Bench: PANKAJ BHANDARI,PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Section 153Section 153(7)Section 4

reassess, or recompute the income of the assessee on or before 31.03.2017. This timeline is, however, subject to the provisions contained in sub- sections (5) and (6). It is, therefore, necessary to examine the applicability of sub-sections (5) and (6) to the present case. 13. Sub-section (5) of Section 153

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

reassessment of such property taxes was made, and the amount of tax to be levied and collected was determined under sub-section (1). The proviso thereto required the Corporation to pay simple interest, at the rate of six percent per annum, on the amount of excess liable to be refunded under Sub-section (2), from the date of the decree

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires