BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 10(38)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,993Mumbai1,724Chennai602Bangalore518Jaipur490Ahmedabad373Hyderabad365Kolkata312Chandigarh205Pune163Surat163Indore149Raipur142Amritsar115Rajkot90Cochin85Visakhapatnam80Karnataka57Nagpur56Lucknow56Agra53Patna52Cuttack47Telangana47Allahabad41Guwahati39Jodhpur34Dehradun33SC19Ranchi16Jabalpur8Calcutta8Kerala6Orissa6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Rajasthan3Varanasi3Panaji3Gauhati2Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 65(1)2

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

10 SCC 627 4 2009 (8) SCC 582 Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:05.10.2025 11:29:12 Signature Not Verified LA.APP. 59/2007 & connected Page 88 of 171 18.4 Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the market value for the acquired land of village, Kilokari cannot be treated differently from the adjacent land of posh colonies such as Maharani

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

10]). (b) ENTRIES IN THE THREE LISTS OF THE SEVENTH SCHEDULE SHOULD BE GIVEN WIDE AMPLITUDE : 21. A Constitution is the mechanism under which the laws are to be made, and is not merely an Act which provides what the law is to be. (India Cements Ltd.[9]; and Attorney General for the State of New South Wales

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

38  as per Rule 3(a) of the GRI11, the entry of ‘telephone sets’ is more specific and therefore, resorting to a ‘residuary entry’ namely, the unscheduled goods, is unwarranted and as such Rule 3(b) of the GRI is applicable;  the application of Rule 3(b) and the test of essential character was not argued in the Nokia India