BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,303Mumbai1,940Bangalore728Chennai670Ahmedabad486Kolkata414Jaipur397Raipur351Hyderabad259Pune225Chandigarh180Rajkot152Indore130Surat93Patna87Nagpur78Lucknow72Amritsar71Cuttack68Agra59Ranchi53Visakhapatnam53Guwahati52Jodhpur42Cochin40Allahabad39Dehradun35Karnataka21SC17Calcutta17Telangana16Orissa12Panaji9Rajasthan7Kerala6Jabalpur4Varanasi4Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 66(1)4Addition to Income4Section 65(1)2Section 39(1)2Section 1472Section 173(1)2Section 2332Reassessment2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENRAL vs. SHRI NIRMAL KUMAR KEDIA

In the result, the impugned orders of the

ITA/4/2020HC Rajasthan30 Sept 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Section 39(1)Section 66(1)

JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI S.T.A. No.4/2020 C/W S.T.A. No.5/2020, S.T.A. No.6/2020, S.T.A. No.7/2020 IN S.T.A. No.4/2020 BETWEEN: M/S. SILICON ESTATES, NO.14, H.M. GENEVA HOUSE, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI. H.J. SIWANI. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ZONE-II, 6TH FLOOR, VTK-1, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009. ... RESPONDENT

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SHREE CEMENT LIMITED

ITA/294/2018HC Rajasthan22 Apr 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,BHUWAN GOYAL

Section 143(3)
Section 147
Section 148
Section 260
Section 40

JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 22/04/2024 AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (ORAL):- 1. Aggrieved of order dated 24.04.2018 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur this appeal is filed under Section 260(A) of Income Tax Act, 1961(for short the “Act”). 2. Brief facts are that the respondent-Company for assessment year (for short “AY”) filed the returns

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JODHPUR vs. GAJ SINGH

ITA/87/2017HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2019

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Section 173(1)

JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR M.F.A. NO.8398 OF 2016 (MV-I) C/W M.F.A. NO.8397 OF 2016 (MV-D), M.F.A. CROB NO.87 OF 2017 IN M.F.A.NO.8397 OF 2016 (MV-D), M.F.A. CROB NO.88 OF 2017 IN M.F.A.NO.8398 OF 2016 (MV-I) IN M.F.A. NO.8398 OF 2016 BETWEEN: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NWKSRTC HAVERI DIVISION, BYADGI UNIT-581110 OWNER OF BUS BEARING

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

reassessment of such property taxes was made, and the amount of tax to be levied and collected was determined under sub-section (1). The proviso thereto required the Corporation to pay simple interest, at the rate of six percent per annum, on the amount of excess liable to be refunded under Sub-section (2), from the date of the decree

M/S S B L PRIVATE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 72 JAIPUR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/51/2017HC Rajasthan15 Mar 2021

Bench: INDRAJIT MAHANTY,SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

For Respondent: (PETITIONER IN OP(ARB) 405/2012 OF DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 2(26)Section 233Section 34

JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1945 ARB.A NO. 51 OF 2017 AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED IN O.P(ARB).405/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE (P), THALASSERY DATED 30/03/2015 REFUSING TO SET ASIDE AWARD NO.23/2011 DATED 03/09/2012. APPELLANT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: (PETITIONER IN OP(ARB) 405/2012 OF DISTRICT JUDGE (P)THALASSERY) KANNUR MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED

MAMTA GUPTA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/130/2019HC Rajasthan28 Jul 2022

Bench: MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,SHUBHA MEHTA

nature and quality of lands is by and large similar to the notified land there should be no interference with respect to the amount of compensation to be awarded. Further reliance is placed upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Om Prakash (D) by LRs & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr3 and Delhi Development Authority

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PALSANA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED

ITA/26/2022HC Rajasthan15 Jan 2025

Bench: INDERJEET SINGH,VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Section 39(1)Section 62(1)Section 65(1)Section 69(1)

JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA STRP NO. 8 OF 2022 C/W STRP NO. 9 OF 2022,STRP NO. 10 OF 2022 STRP NO. 11 OF 2022, STRP NO. 14 OF 2022 STRP NO. 15 OF 2022, STRP NO. 16 OF 2022 STRP NO. 17 OF 2022, STRP NO. 18 OF 2022 STRP NO. 19 OF 2022, STRP NO. 20 OF 2022 STRP