Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,341 Delhi1,148 Chennai640 Bangalore510 Ahmedabad272 Jaipur260 Kolkata243 Hyderabad187 Chandigarh137 Pune130 Raipur110 Indore107 Cochin68 Rajkot64 Lucknow57 Guwahati52 Karnataka47 Surat42 Patna41 Visakhapatnam39 Nagpur38 Ranchi38 Amritsar32 Jodhpur28 Telangana21 SC18 Agra17 Dehradun16 Cuttack15 Allahabad12 Calcutta6 Kerala5 Rajasthan4 Gauhati2 Himachal Pradesh2 Punjab & Haryana2 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 Varanasi2 Panaji1 Orissa1 Uttarakhand1 Jabalpur1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 1487 Section 1474 Section 66(1)4 Section 13A3 Reassessment3 Section 148A2 Section 2332 Reopening of Assessment2 Addition to Income2

M/S S B L PRIVATE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 72 JAIPUR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/51/2017HC Rajasthan15 Mar 2021

Bench: INDRAJIT MAHANTY,SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

For Respondent: (PETITIONER IN OP(ARB) 405/2012 OF DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 2(26)Section 233Section 34

reassessment of tax: Provided that at the time of revision of such annual property tax the exemptions or increases under

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1, JAIPUR vs. SHRI SURENDRA MEENA

ITA/39/2023HC Rajasthan27 Sept 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Section 133(6)Section 139(9)Section 13ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148A

EXEMPTION), CIRCLE 1 (1), DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, Mr. Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh & Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 28.04.2025 1. The petitioner [Assessee] has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a notice dated 30.08.2022 [the impugned notice

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MADAN MOHAN GUPTA

ITA/19/2024HC Rajasthan14 Aug 2025

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANJEET PUROHIT

Section 147Section 148Section 263

reassessment, the AO ultimately comes to conclude that no additions or modifications are warranted under those heads, it would not be entitled to make any additions in respect of other items forming part of the original return. xxxx xxxx xxxx 27. For the sake of completeness, we may note that a Division Bench of this Court had expressed certain doubts

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENRAL vs. SHRI NIRMAL KUMAR KEDIA

In the result, the impugned orders of the

ITA/4/2020HC Rajasthan30 Sept 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Section 39(1)Section 66(1)

REASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22.01.2020 PASSED IN ADCOM/ZONE-II/APP-1/SMR/CR-27/2019-20 BY ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU, ORDER, SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.05.2016 PASSED IN VAT.AP.NO.65/15-16 ON THE FILE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS)- 1, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST ORDER DATED 10.06.2015 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (ADUIT