BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 148clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,219Delhi2,580Chennai1,094Kolkata879Bangalore828Jaipur480Ahmedabad472Hyderabad372Pune322Surat315Chandigarh234Rajkot186Cochin186Indore170Raipur145Visakhapatnam128Amritsar118Nagpur113Lucknow111Agra102Karnataka77Panaji63Allahabad59Guwahati55Calcutta49Cuttack48Jodhpur40Patna34Ranchi24Dehradun22Varanasi19Telangana19SC16Jabalpur14Kerala5Punjab & Haryana4Orissa3Rajasthan2Gauhati1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)4Section 2742

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

ITA/90/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

148/-, which included loss from Business or Profession amounting to Rs. 5,00,14,046/-. The income from short term capital gain Rs. 97,02,942/- and long term capital loss Rs. 350,31,73,044/- was claimed as exempt. 7. During the assessment proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee had claimed advances written off under the head “other

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.

ITA/82/2020
HC Rajasthan
14 Feb 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

Sections 2(h), 2(j), 2(n), 2(t), 2(u) & 2(x). It is argued that in terms of the said provisions information of Registrants would be clearly covered and thus would have to be protected from disclosure. The said sections are extracted hereinunder for ease of reference: “2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— (h) “data