Search: condonation of delay

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

ITA/157/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

51. The last submission of the petitioners is that the petitioners are not liable to pay interest prior to the date of issue of orders dated 12th September, 2008 and 20th October, 2008 directing deposit of the overcharge amount. Paragraph 13 of the DPCO 1995 is enabling power given to the Government to require the overcharge amount to be deposited

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

ITA/151/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

51. The last submission of the petitioners is that the petitioners are not liable to pay interest prior to the date of issue of orders dated 12th September, 2008 and 20th October, 2008 directing deposit of the overcharge amount. Paragraph 13 of the DPCO 1995 is enabling power given to the Government to require the overcharge amount to be deposited

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

M/S UDASEE STAMPING PVT. LTD. vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, JAIPUR

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.