Search: condonation of delay

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

ITA/157/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

48. The next submission of the petitioners that maximum retail price is fixed giving trade margin of 16% and the petitioners never received the aforesaid margin. The said amount had never received by it, it cannot be recovered as overcharge amount. Under paragraph 13 the manufacturer is liable to deposit the amount accrued due to charging of price higher than

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

ITA/151/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

48. The next submission of the petitioners that maximum retail price is fixed giving trade margin of 16% and the petitioners never received the aforesaid margin. The said amount had never received by it, it cannot be recovered as overcharge amount. Under paragraph 13 the manufacturer is liable to deposit the amount accrued due to charging of price higher than

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

M/S UDASEE STAMPING PVT. LTD. vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, JAIPUR

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.