BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,760Mumbai1,641Delhi1,317Kolkata849Ahmedabad757Bangalore737Pune650Jaipur525Hyderabad490Chandigarh327Patna301Surat286Indore280Raipur278Visakhapatnam236Amritsar233Lucknow201Karnataka199Cuttack197Rajkot184Nagpur171Agra161Panaji157Cochin146Calcutta82Jodhpur58Guwahati50Dehradun42Jabalpur36Allahabad29Ranchi28SC24Telangana22Varanasi20Rajasthan6Kerala5Himachal Pradesh4Orissa4Andhra Pradesh2DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 52Section 260A2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S SHRI RAMDOOT PRASAD SEWA SAMITI

ITA/62/2020HC Rajasthan08 Feb 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

For Respondent: Mr. Atarup Banerjee
Section 5

Justice Supratim Bhattacharya S. A. 62 of 2020 With IA No. CAN 1 of 2023 Debabrata Nath & Anr. Versus Sri Amarnath Sinha For the appellants : Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharjee Mr. Debashis Banerjee For the respondent : Mr. Atarup Banerjee Mr. Bapin Baidya Heard On : 29.01.2024 Judgment Delivered On : 29.02.2024 Supratim Bhattacharya, J.: CAN 1 of 2023 1. The application being

PR. COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MANOJ RATHI

Accordingly, the appeal (ITAT/48/2021) stands dismissed

ITA/48/2021HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 260ASection 263

JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 16th June, 2022. The Court : Re: IA No.GA/1/2021: This appeal filed by the revenue is time barred. There is delay of 603 days in filing the appeal. The respondent/assessee has filed an affidavit-in-opposition stating that the delay has not been explained. An affidavit-in-reply has been filed by the department

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

ITA/157/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J U D G M E N T HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J. 1. The present batch of Appeals primarily raises challenges on two issues, which are stated to stand covered by the Judgment of the Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:20.12.2025 17:13:57 Signature Not Verified LPA 891/2011 & connected matters Page

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

ITA/151/2019HC Rajasthan08 Nov 2021

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,REKHA BORANA

JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J U D G M E N T HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J. 1. The present batch of Appeals primarily raises challenges on two issues, which are stated to stand covered by the Judgment of the Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:20.12.2025 17:13:57 Signature Not Verified LPA 891/2011 & connected matters Page

M/S UDASEE STAMPING PVT. LTD. vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, JAIPUR

ITA/132/2019HC Rajasthan16 Jul 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J U D G M E N T HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR J. 1. The present batch of Appeals primarily raises challenges on two issues, which are stated to stand covered by the Judgment of the Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:20.12.2025 17:13:57 Signature Not Verified LPA 891/2011 & connected matters Page

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SKYWAYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE COMPANY (P) LTD.

ITA/82/2020HC Rajasthan14 Feb 2022

Bench: AKIL KURESHI,SUDESH BANSAL

natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and rules relating to the free movement of personal data. 2. This Regulation protects fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and in particular their right to the protection of personal data. 3. The free movement of personal data within the Union shall be neither restricted nor prohibited for reasons