Search: capital gains | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,671 Delhi2,512 Bangalore1,100 Chennai965 Kolkata839 Ahmedabad568 Jaipur405 Hyderabad301 Pune192 Chandigarh170 Indore145 Raipur110 Nagpur94 Cochin94 Lucknow87 Surat74 Rajkot64 SC61 Visakhapatnam41 Amritsar37 Calcutta35 Guwahati30 Cuttack30 Karnataka28 Patna26 Jodhpur24 Agra18 Dehradun17 Jabalpur13 Kerala11 Ranchi8 Panaji8 Orissa7 Telangana7 Varanasi5 Rajasthan4 Allahabad4 Punjab & Haryana3 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Himachal Pradesh1 Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)4 Section 2742 Addition to Income2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 vs. M/S ROYAL JEWELLERS

ITA/81/2024HC Rajasthan15 Oct 2024

Bench: PANKAJ BHANDARI,PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

loss relating de its order dated 03.03.2003 set s taken before the Tribunal who order of CIT (Appeals) and held ee under the head “capital gain

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL

ITA/90/2020HC Rajasthan21 Feb 2024

Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)

Section 271(1)(c)

Section 274

gain Rs. 97,02,942/- and long term capital loss Rs. 350,31,73,044/- was claimed as exempt. 7. During the assessment proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee had claimed advances written off under the head “other expenses” in the P & L and loss from business was primarily due to this. 8. Assessment Order under Section

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI SANJAY CHHABRA

ITA/31/2021HC Rajasthan06 May 2022

Bench: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. v. Tarun Bhargava25, this Court reiterated that in cases involving private employment, the scope of judicial review is limited, and the remedies are governed solely by contract law principles. It was affirmed that the rights of the employees are confined to what is stipulated in the contract, and even if termination is wrongful, Courts will

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS)

ITA/7/2020HC Rajasthan17 Mar 2021

Bench: SANGEET LODHA,RAMESHWAR VYAS

capital valueand, as the tax had already been imposed, levied and collected on that basis, had made the imposition, levy, collection and recovery of the tax valid, notwithstanding the declaration by the Court that, as “rate”, the levy was incompetent; the legislature had equated the tax collected to a “rate”, giving a new meaning to the expression “rate”; while doing