BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 02clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,253Delhi1,072Bangalore569Chennai351Kolkata338Ahmedabad176Hyderabad174Pune163Jaipur126Chandigarh104Raipur98Karnataka89Indore70Surat45Lucknow40Cuttack31Nagpur29Visakhapatnam26Guwahati23Rajkot22Ranchi22Agra21Allahabad21Patna18Jodhpur18Amritsar13Cochin13Jabalpur11Dehradun8Telangana7Varanasi7SC6Panaji6Calcutta5Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 116Section 11(2)6Section 13(8)3Section 2(15)3Section 11(3)3Exemption3Depreciation3Addition to Income3

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR JAIN

ITA/279/2018HC Rajasthan17 Dec 2019

Bench: INDRAJIT MAHANTY,INDERJEET SINGH

For Appellant: SRl. A. V. A. SIVA KARTFor Respondent: Sri A. RAMA I{RISHNA REDDY, representing
Section 151Section 260

02_2017 pan: AAACS4457Q Between: [\//s. Vodafone Mobire Services Lrmited, (Formerrv Mis. Vodafone south Limited ) 1-10-178, Varun Towers-ll, 6th Floor, e"'grrpui, H",/j"rrOaO_ SO6'Oi6: il;";;;" AND ...APPELLANT Assistant commissioner of rncome Tax, TDS circre - 2(r), Hyderabad, 4rh Froor, A- Block, l.T. Towers, A.C. Guards, HyOeraOa-O-_-S0O 001, fifri'lgin;--, ...RESPONDENT IANO:1OF2

C I T JAIPUR vs. J D A JAIPUR

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/284/2010HC Rajasthan
22 Jan 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

02,65,650/- on account of depreciation on fixed assets without appreciating the facts that the application of 100% expenditure of the capital asset is already allowed as capital expenditure hence further allowance of the depreciation on the same capital asset would tantamount to double depreciation.” 6. This Court, while admitting D.B. Inocme Tax Appeal No. 152/2017 framed the following

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTINOS vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/152/2017HC Rajasthan22 Jan 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

02,65,650/- on account of depreciation on fixed assets without appreciating the facts that the application of 100% expenditure of the capital asset is already allowed as capital expenditure hence further allowance of the depreciation on the same capital asset would tantamount to double depreciation.” 6. This Court, while admitting D.B. Inocme Tax Appeal No. 152/2017 framed the following

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTINOS vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/150/2017HC Rajasthan22 Jan 2026

Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGEETA SHARMA

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(3)Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

02,65,650/- on account of depreciation on fixed assets without appreciating the facts that the application of 100% expenditure of the capital asset is already allowed as capital expenditure hence further allowance of the depreciation on the same capital asset would tantamount to double depreciation.” 6. This Court, while admitting D.B. Inocme Tax Appeal No. 152/2017 framed the following