THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-4(1),RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH, RAIPUR (CG)
In the result appeal of the revenue is partly allowed
ITA 18/BIL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur31 Oct 2022AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.18/Rpr/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Acit-4(1), Raipur Vs Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Through Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd., O/O. General Manager Finance, Ground Floor, Vidyut Seva Bhavan, Dangania, Raipur Pan No. : Aabcc 7876 Q (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Madhur Agrawal, Adv. & Shri Praveen Khandelwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 02/08/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/10/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A)-2, Raipur, Dated 22.12.2016 For The Assessment Year 2009- 2010, On The Following Grounds :- 1. “Whether On Points Of Law & On Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Was Justified In Deleting The Disallowance Of Rs.54,75,392/- Incurred On Coal Shortage?” 2. “Whether On Points Of Law & On Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Was Justified In Deleting The Disallowance Of Rs.6,08,96,17,054/- Claimed U/S.80Ia(4)(Iv)(C) Of The I.T.Act, 1961?” 3. The Order Of Ld. Cit(A) Is Erroneous Both In Law & Facts. 4. Any Other Ground That May Be Adduced At The Time Of Hearing 2. The Ground-Wise Decisions Are As Under:-
For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agrawal, Adv. & Shri PraveenFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 80I
17,054/- claimed u/s.80IA(4)(iv)(c) of the I.T.Act,
1961?”
3. The order of Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous both in law and facts.
4. Any other ground that may be adduced at the time of hearing
2. The ground-wise decisions are as under:-
2
Ground 1: Deleting the disallowance
