BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 144C(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi885Mumbai673Hyderabad169Bangalore115Chennai79Kolkata57Ahmedabad54Pune40Jaipur21Visakhapatnam20Chandigarh15Dehradun11Indore11Cochin8Surat8Rajkot8Amritsar3Cuttack3Panaji2Raipur2Lucknow1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 92C3Section 92B3Section 802Section 80I2Transfer Pricing2

GODAWARI POWER AND ISPAT LTD.,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTER, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 42/RPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI ARUN KHODPIA (Accountant Member)

For Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 80Section 80ISection 92BSection 92C

144C(3) of the Act. The TPO vide letter dated 13/01/2022 received by AO’s office on 16/01/2022 forwarded the revised computation as per the directions given by Ld DRP in order dated 28/12/2021. The TPO in its letter stated that - "the assessee has transferred power from Unit-2 at Rs.61,72,090,010/-. Accordingly total downward adjustment amounting

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), RAIPUR vs. C. G. ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED, RAIPUR

ITA 95/RPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 95/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 92BSection 92C

144C(3) of the Act, claiming that the same is not justified, void-ab-initio, bad in law and liable to be quashed. The said addition has been vacated by the first appellate authority, while deciding the additional ground of appeal challenging the validity of assessment order in as much as provisions of Section 92BA