BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “section 68”+ Section 249clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai565Delhi523Karnataka487Ahmedabad151Kolkata140Bangalore135Jaipur126Chennai65Chandigarh58Indore56Hyderabad56Pune54Nagpur47Surat41Raipur39Guwahati17Calcutta17Cochin16Visakhapatnam14Lucknow14Rajkot11Telangana9Varanasi8Agra7Amritsar7Dehradun7SC7Ranchi6Panaji5Rajasthan4Cuttack4Patna3Allahabad3Jodhpur2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income38Section 271(1)(c)34Section 40A(3)30Disallowance21Section 6816Penalty14Section 143(2)9Depreciation9Section 1548Section 143(3)

VEER PROJECTS,RAIPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 654/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 654/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19)

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Chhabda, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Saad Kidwai, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 249(2)Section 250Section 68

68 of the Act and taxable at special Rate u/s 115BBE 1. Unsecured Loan 2,63,43,671 1. Sundry Creditors 2,56,47,012 Total assessed Income Rs.6,70,06,800 4. Aggrieved with the aforesaid additions, assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), however, the appeal of assessee has been dismissed in limine, without any adjudication

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

8
Section 1446
Search & Seizure6

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( CENTRAL)-2, RAIPUR vs. MESERS SHREE JAGDAMBA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 41/RPR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 37 To 42/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A
Section 40A(3)

249 ITR 113 2001 Allahabad Commissioner-of Income-tax v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal the Tribunal deleted disallowance made under section 40A(3) holding that assessee's case fell under second proviso to section 40A(3). Honourable High Court held that in view of Supreme Court's observations that terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute, that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( CENTRAL)-2, RAIPUR vs. MESERS SHREE JAGDAMBA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/RPR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Sept 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 37 To 42/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A
Section 40A(3)

249 ITR 113 2001 Allahabad Commissioner-of Income-tax v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal the Tribunal deleted disallowance made under section 40A(3) holding that assessee's case fell under second proviso to section 40A(3). Honourable High Court held that in view of Supreme Court's observations that terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute, that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( CENTRAL)-2, RAIPUR vs. MESERS SHREE JAGDAMBA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 39/RPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 37 To 42/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A
Section 40A(3)

249 ITR 113 2001 Allahabad Commissioner-of Income-tax v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal the Tribunal deleted disallowance made under section 40A(3) holding that assessee's case fell under second proviso to section 40A(3). Honourable High Court held that in view of Supreme Court's observations that terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute, that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( CENTRAL)-2, RAIPUR vs. MESERS SHREE JAGDAMBA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 38/RPR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 37 To 42/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A
Section 40A(3)

249 ITR 113 2001 Allahabad Commissioner-of Income-tax v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal the Tribunal deleted disallowance made under section 40A(3) holding that assessee's case fell under second proviso to section 40A(3). Honourable High Court held that in view of Supreme Court's observations that terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute, that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( CENTRAL)-2, RAIPUR vs. MESERS SHREE JAGDAMBA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 37/RPR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 37 To 42/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A
Section 40A(3)

249 ITR 113 2001 Allahabad Commissioner-of Income-tax v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal the Tribunal deleted disallowance made under section 40A(3) holding that assessee's case fell under second proviso to section 40A(3). Honourable High Court held that in view of Supreme Court's observations that terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute, that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( CENTRAL)-2, RAIPUR vs. MESERS SHREE JAGDAMBA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 42/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 37 To 42/Rpr/2020 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, C.A
Section 40A(3)

249 ITR 113 2001 Allahabad Commissioner-of Income-tax v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal the Tribunal deleted disallowance made under section 40A(3) holding that assessee's case fell under second proviso to section 40A(3). Honourable High Court held that in view of Supreme Court's observations that terms of section 40A(3) are not absolute, that

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)-1, RAIPUR vs. SHRI CHAITANY MAHAPRABHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, RAIPUR

ITA 235/RPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 235/Rpr/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, (Exemption)-1, Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Chaitany Mahaprabhu Shikshan Sansthan 2, Jindal Niwas, Ramsagarpara, Raipur(C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aaits4845F ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal & Smt. Laxmi Sharma, Cas Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 28.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09.09.2022

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 158BSection 68

68 of the Act by the A.O. Accordingly, the CIT(A) on the basis of his aforesaid observations vacated the addition of Rs. 2,33,52,000/- that was made by the A.O under Sec.68 of the Act. 6. The revenue being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A) has carried the matter in appeal before

D.C.I.T. CENTRAL CRICLE,, RAIPUR vs. SHREE SHYAM SPONGE & POWER P.LTD, RAIPUR

ITA 247/BIL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Oct 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singh

For Respondent: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, A.R
Section 68

249 Shree 2006-07 18.07.14 27.03.14 153A r.w.s. /RPR/14 Shyam to 2012- 143(3) of the a/w. CO Sponge And 13 Income Tax Nos. 18 to Power Pvt. Act, 1961 (in 24/RPR/2015 Ltd. short ‘the Act’) 2. The issues being common, interlinked and similar, all the captioned Revenue’s appeals in respect of the captioned assessee have been heard together

D.C.I.T. CENTRAL CRICLE,, RAIPUR vs. SHREE SHYAM SPONGE & POWER P.LTD, RAIPUR

ITA 248/BIL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singh

For Respondent: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, A.R
Section 68

249 Shree 2006-07 18.07.14 27.03.14 153A r.w.s. /RPR/14 Shyam to 2012- 143(3) of the a/w. CO Sponge And 13 Income Tax Nos. 18 to Power Pvt. Act, 1961 (in 24/RPR/2015 Ltd. short ‘the Act’) 2. The issues being common, interlinked and similar, all the captioned Revenue’s appeals in respect of the captioned assessee have been heard together

D.C.I.T. CENTRAL CRICLE,, RAIPUR vs. SHREE SHYAM SPONGE & POWER P.LTD, RAIPUR

ITA 244/BIL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Oct 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singh

For Respondent: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, A.R
Section 68

249 Shree 2006-07 18.07.14 27.03.14 153A r.w.s. /RPR/14 Shyam to 2012- 143(3) of the a/w. CO Sponge And 13 Income Tax Nos. 18 to Power Pvt. Act, 1961 (in 24/RPR/2015 Ltd. short ‘the Act’) 2. The issues being common, interlinked and similar, all the captioned Revenue’s appeals in respect of the captioned assessee have been heard together

D.C.I.T. CENTRAL CRICLE,, RAIPUR vs. SHREE SHYAM SPONGE & POWER P.LTD, RAIPUR

ITA 243/BIL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Oct 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singh

For Respondent: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, A.R
Section 68

249 Shree 2006-07 18.07.14 27.03.14 153A r.w.s. /RPR/14 Shyam to 2012- 143(3) of the a/w. CO Sponge And 13 Income Tax Nos. 18 to Power Pvt. Act, 1961 (in 24/RPR/2015 Ltd. short ‘the Act’) 2. The issues being common, interlinked and similar, all the captioned Revenue’s appeals in respect of the captioned assessee have been heard together

D.C.I.T. CENTRAL CRICLE,, RAIPUR vs. SHREE SHYAM SPONGE & POWER P.LTD, RAIPUR

ITA 246/BIL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Oct 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singh

For Respondent: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, A.R
Section 68

249 Shree 2006-07 18.07.14 27.03.14 153A r.w.s. /RPR/14 Shyam to 2012- 143(3) of the a/w. CO Sponge And 13 Income Tax Nos. 18 to Power Pvt. Act, 1961 (in 24/RPR/2015 Ltd. short ‘the Act’) 2. The issues being common, interlinked and similar, all the captioned Revenue’s appeals in respect of the captioned assessee have been heard together

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 744/RPR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.744/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Rajendra Kumar Shrivastava, Mig-42, Padmanabhpur, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan: Alops3921M

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 154Section 154(2)(B)Section 154(8)Section 155Section 186Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

68 dated 17/11/1971. My application will be accepted rupees 7,69,000/- be deleted.” 2. At the time of hearing, none appeared for the assessee and no adjournment petition has been filed. The matter was heard after recording the submissions of the Ld. Sr. DR and on a careful perusal of the materials/documents available on record. 3. In this case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), RAIPUR vs. MESERSS T.C. BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, RAIPUR

In the result CO filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 173/RPR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assistant Commissioner Of Vs M/S. Tc Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Vasudev, B-5, Sector-5, Raipur, (C.G.) Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aacct4516F Cross Objection No. 26/Rpr/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 173/Rpr/2019) (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs M/S. Tc Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Vasudev, B-5, Sector-5, Raipur, (C.G.) Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aacct4516F (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16-08-2023 घोषणाक" तार"ख/Date : 27-10-2023 Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

68,05,400/-, wherein the share of assessee’s was 50% i.e. Rs. 34,02,700/-. This property was a part of the residential project "Banyan Tree Enclave" at Shankar Nagar, Raipur. The assessee had entered into joint venture on 28.12.2006 with M/s Biltech Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (AACCB2418A) for development of 1.977 Hectares of land situated at Shankar Nagar, Raipur

SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LTD.,,BILASPUR(CG) vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), BILASPUR(CG)

ITA 144/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 271(1)(c)

section 5, when it is received or deemed to be received by a person. All income for the purpose of charge of income-tax and computation of total income is required to be classified under distinct heads of income such as salaries, income from house property, profits and gains of business or profession, capital gains and income from other

THE SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LTD., BILASPUR,BILASPUR(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE , 1(1)BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG)

ITA 163/BIL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 271(1)(c)

section 5, when it is received or deemed to be received by a person. All income for the purpose of charge of income-tax and computation of total income is required to be classified under distinct heads of income such as salaries, income from house property, profits and gains of business or profession, capital gains and income from other

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1(1)BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG) vs. THE SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LTD., BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG)

ITA 97/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 271(1)(c)

section 5, when it is received or deemed to be received by a person. All income for the purpose of charge of income-tax and computation of total income is required to be classified under distinct heads of income such as salaries, income from house property, profits and gains of business or profession, capital gains and income from other

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

ITA 42/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 271(1)(c)

section 5, when it is received or deemed to be received by a person. All income for the purpose of charge of income-tax and computation of total income is required to be classified under distinct heads of income such as salaries, income from house property, profits and gains of business or profession, capital gains and income from other

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

ITA 41/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 271(1)(c)

section 5, when it is received or deemed to be received by a person. All income for the purpose of charge of income-tax and computation of total income is required to be classified under distinct heads of income such as salaries, income from house property, profits and gains of business or profession, capital gains and income from other