BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi624Mumbai421Bangalore266Jaipur114Ahmedabad103Hyderabad103Chennai69Kolkata60Nagpur36Pune36Indore36Karnataka31Allahabad31Ranchi29Jodhpur29Lucknow23Chandigarh22Agra21Visakhapatnam21Cochin17Amritsar15Rajkot14Guwahati13Surat13Dehradun12Raipur5SC4Varanasi2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Cuttack1Panaji1Patna1Telangana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1489Section 271(1)(c)8Section 148A5Addition to Income4Section 1473Section 1443Section 270A2Section 36(1)(va)2Section 115J2Penalty

SWISS LIFESTYLE, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 25/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.25/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Swiss Lifestyle Naidu Complex, Near Hotel Babylon Inn, Jail Road, Raipur-492 001 Pan: Acgfs7296G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 234ASection 44ASection 68

68 and taxed u/s.115BBE at Rs.30,48,500/-, and CIT(A) erred in sustaining the same therefore order passed is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive. 3 M/s.Swiss Lifestyle Vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur 8. The learned assessing officer erred in making addition of Rs.30,48,500/- as unexplained money u/s.68 without pointing out any defect in the books of accounts

2
Disallowance2

SMT. ANITA BANODHA ALIAS ANITA KATHGAR , ANITA AUTO, PONDI CHIRMIRI KOREA,KOREA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 230/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.230/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Smt. Anita Banodha Alias Anita Kathgar Anita Auto, Pondi, West Chirmiri, Korea (C.G)-497 449 Pan: Afgpj1876C ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur-1(C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Sethia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raghunath, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

68,425/- is liable to be disallowed u/s 37(1) of the Act. The above omission has led to under levy of tax including Cess of Rs.34,696/- and interest u/s 234a and 234B amounting to Rs.18,041/- and 20,817/- respectively. 7 Smt. Anita Banodha alias Anita Kathgar Vs. Pr. CIT, Raipur-1 Thus, aggregate under levy

INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), RAIPUR, CIVIL LINES, RAIPUR vs. SMITA MUKESH KEDIA, RAIPUR

ITA 451/RPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 451/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri G. S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 44ASection 69C

68 of the Act. However, the AO has not done so. The AO has made addition on the basis of presumption only. 6.3.2 In the present case, the appellant submitted copy of purchase bill, invoices containing transport details, stock register of the seller, confirmation from seller, GS return of seller, bank statement highlighting mode of payment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR vs. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD., RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 3/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2 & 3/Rpr/2023 Co Nos. 19 & 20/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.)

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K Meena, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(va)

68 CCH 113 (Mum). The Ld. AR took us through the relevant observations of the Courts/Tribunal in the aforementioned judicial pronouncements, based on which penalty u/s. 270A of the Act was quashed in the respective cases for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction by the A.O. 35. Alternatively, the Ld. AR submitted that as the total income of the assessee

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR vs. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD., RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2 & 3/Rpr/2023 Co Nos. 19 & 20/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.)

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K Meena, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(va)

68 CCH 113 (Mum). The Ld. AR took us through the relevant observations of the Courts/Tribunal in the aforementioned judicial pronouncements, based on which penalty u/s. 270A of the Act was quashed in the respective cases for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction by the A.O. 35. Alternatively, the Ld. AR submitted that as the total income of the assessee