BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai79Delhi51Chandigarh45Pune31Kolkata27Bangalore24Ahmedabad23Jaipur22Cuttack18Hyderabad15Chennai15Visakhapatnam14Rajkot10Raipur9Surat7Nagpur6Cochin5Jodhpur2Lucknow2Ranchi1Agra1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 4026Section 143(3)14Section 6814Disallowance9Addition to Income9Deduction7Section 143(2)5Section 1445TDS5Section 14A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1)), BHILAI vs. SHRI SANJAY JAIN, BHILAI

In the result ground no. 06 of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 55/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No: Ita 55/Rpr/2020 (Assessment Years:2014-15) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, V Shri Sanjay Jain, Bhilai S C/O M/S Sidhharth Industries, Plot No. 38, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, C.G. Pan: Aet Pj1859D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ravi Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23-08-2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 09-11-2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 68

194A to deduct TDS cannot be applied on such payments, consequently, disallowance by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) was bad in law, thus, the same is directed to be deleted. Ground No. 1 of the revenue is, thus, dismissed in terms of aforesaid observations. 8 Sanjay Jain Ground NO. 2: disallowance u/s 68

4
Section 143(1)3
Section 194A3

SHRI SATNAM SINGH WADHAWA,PROP M/S PALI TRANSPORT & M/S COAL MOVERS,H.NO. 20,BEEDPARA, WARD NO.10,DIST: RAIGARH(CG) vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), MAHIMA COMPLEX, VYAPAR VIHAR, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in terms of my aforesaid observations

ITA 177/RPR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No. 177/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Shri Satnam Singh Wadhawa Prop. M/S. Patil Transport & M/S. Coal Movers, H. No.20, Beedpara, Ward No.10, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) Pan :Aahpw1157H .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Gitesh Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 40

Section 194A of the Act had failed to deduct tax at source on the interest paid to Tata Motors Finance Ltd. (NBFC), therefore, the A.O had rightly disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) its claim for deduction of the interest expenditure of Rs.10,68

DY.C.I.T. 1 vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 222/BIL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.222& 318/Rpr/2014 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11& 2011-12

For Appellant: ShriMakarand Joshi and ShriAniruddhaKavimandanFor Respondent: Smt. AnubhaTahGoel
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

194A of the Act, which the assessee had failed to deduct. The Assessing Officer was therefore, of the view that provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act are applicable. He accordingly, by applying the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act made addition of A.Y. 2010-11 & 2011-12 Rs.4,66,658/-. Aggrieved by the order

DY.C.I.T. 1, BHILAI(CG) vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 318/BIL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.222& 318/Rpr/2014 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11& 2011-12

For Appellant: ShriMakarand Joshi and ShriAniruddhaKavimandanFor Respondent: Smt. AnubhaTahGoel
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

194A of the Act, which the assessee had failed to deduct. The Assessing Officer was therefore, of the view that provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act are applicable. He accordingly, by applying the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act made addition of A.Y. 2010-11 & 2011-12 Rs.4,66,658/-. Aggrieved by the order

SHRI SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL, KORBA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assesee in ITA No

ITA 93/BIL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 93 & 94/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., T.P Nagar, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C Roy, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 40Section 68

68 of the Act. 7. Apropos the disallowance made by the A.O u/s 14A of the Act of the assessee’s claim for deduction of interest expenditure of Rs.2,86,300/-, it was observed by the CIT(Appeals) that though the assessee had made 6 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range, Korba

SHRI SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL, KORBA,KORBA(CG) vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE KORBA, KORBA(CG)

In the result, appeal of the assesee in ITA No

ITA 94/BIL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 93 & 94/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., T.P Nagar, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C Roy, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 40Section 68

68 of the Act. 7. Apropos the disallowance made by the A.O u/s 14A of the Act of the assessee’s claim for deduction of interest expenditure of Rs.2,86,300/-, it was observed by the CIT(Appeals) that though the assessee had made 6 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range, Korba

SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR,BHILAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIOMER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 54/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur28 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 54/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Shri Sandeep Surendran Nair 38, Income Tax Colony, Gadge Nagar, Hingna Road, Nagpur (M.H.)-440016 Pan : Aczpn2865M .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/shri Makarand M. Joshi &For Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

68 of the Act as unexplained cash credit. b- Ultratech Cement (Awarpur Cement) :- There is a difference of Rs. 9,85,367/- in the receipts as per 26AS and as per books. The receipts shown in books of accounts are short. The assessee has been asked to explain the same. The assessee has explained and stated that the Ultratech Cement

SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL,KORBA vs. DEPUTY COMMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, KORBA, KORBA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 148/RPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.148/Rpr/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Prop. Of M/S. Shrikishan & Co., Darri Road, Korba (C.G.) Pan : Acgpa4350B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-Korba (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Y.K Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C. Roy, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

194A of the Act. Considering the technical lapse on the part of the assessee in not furnishing the accountant certificates in the prescribed form, i.e “Form 26A” r.w Rule 31ACB, we, thus, in all fairness restore the issue to the file 6 Sushil Kumar AgrawalVs. DCIT, Circle-Korba (C.G.) of the A.O with a liberty to the assessee to furnish

M/S G.N.CONSTRUCTION vs. I.T.O. WARD AMBIKAPUR, AMBIKAPUR (CG)

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 270/BIL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Apr 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri R.L. Negi)

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri O.P Choudhary, D.R
Section 144Section 144(1)Section 194ASection 40

194A, which under the facts and the law of the case, is unjustified and the same be deleted. 3. At the very outset the counsel for the assessee stated that he is not pressing ground No. 4 and therefore the same is dismissed as not pressed. 4. With ground No. 1 the assessee challenges the validity of the assessment order