ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1), BHILAI vs. SHRI NITIN SANKHLA, DURG
In the result, grounds no 2 to 7 on this single issue of the appeal of the revenue are dismissed
ITA 98/RPR/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jun 2023AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.98/Rpr/2020 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Vs Shri Nitin Sankhla 1(1), Bhilai 1St Floor, Navkar Bullion, Above Navin Jeweller, Jawahar Chowk, Durg Pan No. :Bbups 4874 C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. : Shri Ravi Agarwal, Ca "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ila M. Parmar, Cit- Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 02/06/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/06/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am :
For Respondent: Shri Ila M. Parmar, CIT- DR
Section 129Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 68
10
9. The ld. AR further submitted that out of 9 loan creditors, 3 have repaid the loans in the same year and remaining creditors have also repaid their loans in subsequent years. Therefore, the transactions are of the genuine loans and repayment, the same cannot be considered as bogus on which the provisions of section 68
