HITESH GOLCHHA,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

264 to 279 of paper book) Conclusion:[relevant para at page no.265 of paper book]. proceeding. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. vs, R. R. ENERGY LTD, & ANR.IN THE ITAT RAIPUR [(2018) 52 CCH 00 521] (refer page no. 280 to 300 of paper book) Conclusion:[relevant para at page no.282 of paper book]. In the absence of seized material

HITESH GOLCHHA,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

264 to 279 of paper book) Conclusion:[relevant para at page no.265 of paper book]. proceeding. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. vs, R. R. ENERGY LTD, & ANR.IN THE ITAT RAIPUR [(2018) 52 CCH 00 521] (refer page no. 280 to 300 of paper book) Conclusion:[relevant para at page no.282 of paper book]. In the absence of seized material

HITESH GOLCHHA,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed, in terms of our observations herein above

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.101, 102, 103 & 104/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) V. Hitesh Golchha Acit, Prop. Of Mouli Investment, Central Circle-1 Jeevan Ganga, Near Dani Bada, Raipur Budha Para, Raipur – 492 001 Chhattisgarh [Pan: Agjpg 7698 F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. Subramanyam, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri S. K. Meena, Cit-D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.11.2023

264 to 279 of paper book) Conclusion:[relevant para at page no.265 of paper book]. proceeding. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. vs, R. R. ENERGY LTD, & ANR.IN THE ITAT RAIPUR [(2018) 52 CCH 00 521] (refer page no. 280 to 300 of paper book) Conclusion:[relevant para at page no.282 of paper book]. In the absence of seized material

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

147 of the Act to reopen an assessment only after due application of mind. If for some reason, there is an error that creeps into this exercise by the AO, then the law expects the superior officer to be able to correct that error. This explains why Section 151 (1) requires an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

147 of the Act to reopen an assessment only after due application of mind. If for some reason, there is an error that creeps into this exercise by the AO, then the law expects the superior officer to be able to correct that error. This explains why Section 151 (1) requires an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

147 of the Act to reopen an assessment only after due application of mind. If for some reason, there is an error that creeps into this exercise by the AO, then the law expects the superior officer to be able to correct that error. This explains why Section 151 (1) requires an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

147 of the Act to reopen an assessment only after due application of mind. If for some reason, there is an error that creeps into this exercise by the AO, then the law expects the superior officer to be able to correct that error. This explains why Section 151 (1) requires an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

147 of the Act to reopen an assessment only after due application of mind. If for some reason, there is an error that creeps into this exercise by the AO, then the law expects the superior officer to be able to correct that error. This explains why Section 151 (1) requires an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

147 of the Act to reopen an assessment only after due application of mind. If for some reason, there is an error that creeps into this exercise by the AO, then the law expects the superior officer to be able to correct that error. This explains why Section 151 (1) requires an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

264 (Kar.) viii) CIT V/s. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. (2016) 3851TR 346 (Kar.) ix) PCIT V/s.Ms. Lata Jain (2016) 384lTR 543 (Del.) x)ClT Vis. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2017)79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.) xi) PClT V/s. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 395 lTR 526 (Del) xii) ClT V/S. SKS lspat & Power Ltd. (20l7) 398 1TR 584 (Bom.HC) xiii) CIT V/s. Deepak

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

264 (Kar.) viii) CIT V/s. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. (2016) 3851TR 346 (Kar.) ix) PCIT V/s.Ms. Lata Jain (2016) 384lTR 543 (Del.) x)ClT Vis. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2017)79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.) xi) PClT V/s. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 395 lTR 526 (Del) xii) ClT V/S. SKS lspat & Power Ltd. (20l7) 398 1TR 584 (Bom.HC) xiii) CIT V/s. Deepak

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

264 (Kar.) viii) CIT V/s. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. (2016) 3851TR 346 (Kar.) ix) PCIT V/s.Ms. Lata Jain (2016) 384lTR 543 (Del.) x)ClT Vis. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2017)79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.) xi) PClT V/s. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 395 lTR 526 (Del) xii) ClT V/S. SKS lspat & Power Ltd. (20l7) 398 1TR 584 (Bom.HC) xiii) CIT V/s. Deepak

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

264 (Kar.) viii) CIT V/s. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. (2016) 3851TR 346 (Kar.) ix) PCIT V/s.Ms. Lata Jain (2016) 384lTR 543 (Del.) x)ClT Vis. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2017)79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.) xi) PClT V/s. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 395 lTR 526 (Del) xii) ClT V/S. SKS lspat & Power Ltd. (20l7) 398 1TR 584 (Bom.HC) xiii) CIT V/s. Deepak

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

264 (Kar.) viii) CIT V/s. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. (2016) 3851TR 346 (Kar.) ix) PCIT V/s.Ms. Lata Jain (2016) 384lTR 543 (Del.) x)ClT Vis. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2017)79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.) xi) PClT V/s. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 395 lTR 526 (Del) xii) ClT V/S. SKS lspat & Power Ltd. (20l7) 398 1TR 584 (Bom.HC) xiii) CIT V/s. Deepak

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

264 (Kar.) viii) CIT V/s. IBC Knowledge Park (P) Ltd. (2016) 3851TR 346 (Kar.) ix) PCIT V/s.Ms. Lata Jain (2016) 384lTR 543 (Del.) x)ClT Vis. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2017)79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.) xi) PClT V/s. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 395 lTR 526 (Del) xii) ClT V/S. SKS lspat & Power Ltd. (20l7) 398 1TR 584 (Bom.HC) xiii) CIT V/s. Deepak

RASHMI SPONGE IRON AND POWER INDUSTRIES,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.98/Rpr/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Rashmi Sponge Iron & Power Vs Principal Commissioner Of Income Industries Pvt. Ltd., Tax, 407-408, Ganpati Sadan, Raipur-1, Samta Colony, Raipur Raipur Pan No. : Aaacj2311G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : Sh. Rajesh Kumar Chawda, Ca राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By : Sh. Simran Bhullar, Cit (Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 20.07.2023 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 20.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : The Present Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Pcit), Raipur-1, Dated 23.03.2022 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. At The Outset, Learned Counsel Appearing For The Assessee Submitted That The Assessee Wants To Withdraw The Present Appeal. He Has Also Filed An Application Dated 18.07.2023 For Withdrawal Of The Appeal, Which Is Extracted As Under: “It Is Most Humbly Requested Before This Hon’Ble Bench To Kindly Allow Us To Withdraw The Appeal On Following Facts:- 1) The Proceedings U/S 263 Of The It Act, 1961 Was Started On 09.08.2021 Relating To Ay 2017-18 During The Pendency Of Re- Assessment Proceeding Already Started On 09.06.2021 U/S 148 Of The It Act, 1961 & Accordingly Was Objection Raised On 08.09.2021 Which Was Not Considered By Ld. Pr. Cit, Raipur & Alongwith Request Of Personal Hearing Made On 18.02.2022 Before Deciding The Case & Passed The Order U/S 263 Of The It Act, 1961 Dated 23.03.2023. (Copies Attached)

u/s 147 w.r.t. Sec. 144B of the IT Act. Dt. 08.05.2023. (Copies attached) 3) As per the provision of Sec. 153(3) of the IT Act, 1961 which provides as under :- “Section 153 : Time limit for completion of assessment, reassessment and re-computation. (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), an order of fresh assessment in pursuance

SHIR BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LTD.,RAIPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri N. K. Choudhryआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 32/Rpr/2021) ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12)

reassessment was completed on 06.12.2018 as such and tax levied under MAT for Rs. 61299035/- on book profit of Rs. 307563963/-. Incorrect allowance of deduction u/s 80IA of IT Act. Audit examination revealed that the RAP has pointed out for incorrect allowance of deduction u/s 80IA due to non-maintenance of separate books of accounts and disallowance made on account