SANDEEP KAUR GILL, RAIPUR ,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 (1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of over aforesaid observations
ITA 237/RPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur21 May 2025AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 237/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2014-15)
For Appellant: Shri Hardik Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)
147
has been passed with the addition of Rs. 10,57,752/- and consequently, penalty proceedings u/s 271 was initiated, but during the penalty proceedings, there was no appropriate response by the assessee qua the issue of penalty, therefore, a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) vide order dated 29.05.2018 for Rs.3,17,452/- was imposed. Against the impugned penalty order