RAHUL BAJPAI,IDGAH CHOWK vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), SHRI RAM PLAZA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.348/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 Rahul Bajpai Idgah Chowk, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh-495 001 Pan: Aexpb4410L .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

section 56(2)(vii)(b) not considering that the land purchased was stock in trade and shown in the balance sheet as current assets at the time of original assessment also. 6. That CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of Rs.3,70,89,000/- to the total income of the appellant. 3 Rahul Bajpai Vs. ACIT, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur

MUSADDILAL MANSARAM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 160/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16)

56(2)(vii)(b) is applicable only to individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) for Assessment Year 2015-16 and not to companies, which is the assessee in the present case? 5. Any other ground which may be adduced at the time of hearing 3. Since the facts of both the appeals are common, interconnected and interwoven, therefore, are taken

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), BILASPUR vs. MUSADDILAL MANSARAM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. , BILASPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 160/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16)

56(2)(vii)(b) is applicable only to individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) for Assessment Year 2015-16 and not to companies, which is the assessee in the present case? 5. Any other ground which may be adduced at the time of hearing 3. Since the facts of both the appeals are common, interconnected and interwoven, therefore, are taken

BHARAT BHUSHAN VERMA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's appeal is allowed in terms of the observations above

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 236/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Bharat Bhushan Verma Main Road, Verma Transport Bharat, Baikunth, P.O.-Baikunth, Raipur (C.G.)-493 116 Pan : Acdpv7254J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Oficer-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

56,820/-, therefore, the pecuniary jurisdiction over his case remained vested with the ITO-1(3), Raipur with whom the return of income was filed. Elaborating on his aforesaid contention, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that pursuant to the CBDT Instruction No.1/2011 dated 31.01.2011 r.w. CBDT instruction No.6/2011 dated 08.04.2011, the jurisdiction in case of non-corporate assessees

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

56] is required to be made, the assessing officer may require the valuation officer to make on estimate of such value and report the some to him. (2) The valuation officer to whom a reference is made under sub- section (1) shall, for the purpose of dealing with such reference, hove 011 the powers that be has under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

56] is required to be made, the assessing officer may require the valuation officer to make on estimate of such value and report the some to him. (2) The valuation officer to whom a reference is made under sub- section (1) shall, for the purpose of dealing with such reference, hove 011 the powers that be has under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

56] is required to be made, the assessing officer may require the valuation officer to make on estimate of such value and report the some to him. (2) The valuation officer to whom a reference is made under sub- section (1) shall, for the purpose of dealing with such reference, hove 011 the powers that be has under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

56] is required to be made, the assessing officer may require the valuation officer to make on estimate of such value and report the some to him. (2) The valuation officer to whom a reference is made under sub- section (1) shall, for the purpose of dealing with such reference, hove 011 the powers that be has under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

56] is required to be made, the assessing officer may require the valuation officer to make on estimate of such value and report the some to him. (2) The valuation officer to whom a reference is made under sub- section (1) shall, for the purpose of dealing with such reference, hove 011 the powers that be has under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -I, RAIPUR vs. LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.188 To 193/Rpr/2019 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013 To 2017-2018) Acit, Central Circle-1, Raipur(Cg) Vs M/S Lord Buddha Educational Society, M/S Raipur Institute Of Medical Sciences (Rims), Gram Godhi, Bhansoj Road, Office Nh-6, Raipur (Cg) Pan No. :Aaaal 3913 E (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

56] is required to be made, the assessing officer may require the valuation officer to make on estimate of such value and report the some to him. (2) The valuation officer to whom a reference is made under sub- section (1) shall, for the purpose of dealing with such reference, hove 011 the powers that be has under section

M/S MATA ROAD CARRIERS,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI ARUN KHODPIA (Accountant Member)

vii) Durga Manikanta Traders, ITA No.59/RPR/2019, order dated 12.12.2022; 13. In view of the above submissions, it was the prayer of the ld. AR that since the notice u/s.143(2) of the Act itself was invalid, the assessment order u/s. 143(3) of the Act, dated 27.03.2014, is illegal, non- est, bad in law, and deserves to be quashed

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

56,500 6 6,61,200 6,61,200 80,660 11.3 800 11.4.1 2009-10 153A/143(3) 856060 10,10,152 11.3 27,50,684 27,50,680 8,84,472 11.4.1 2010-11 153A/143(3) 923110 25,000 6 29,66,078 29,66,080 20,17,968 11.3 2011-12 153A/143

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

56,500 6 6,61,200 6,61,200 80,660 11.3 800 11.4.1 2009-10 153A/143(3) 856060 10,10,152 11.3 27,50,684 27,50,680 8,84,472 11.4.1 2010-11 153A/143(3) 923110 25,000 6 29,66,078 29,66,080 20,17,968 11.3 2011-12 153A/143

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

56,500 6 6,61,200 6,61,200 80,660 11.3 800 11.4.1 2009-10 153A/143(3) 856060 10,10,152 11.3 27,50,684 27,50,680 8,84,472 11.4.1 2010-11 153A/143(3) 923110 25,000 6 29,66,078 29,66,080 20,17,968 11.3 2011-12 153A/143

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

56,500 6 6,61,200 6,61,200 80,660 11.3 800 11.4.1 2009-10 153A/143(3) 856060 10,10,152 11.3 27,50,684 27,50,680 8,84,472 11.4.1 2010-11 153A/143(3) 923110 25,000 6 29,66,078 29,66,080 20,17,968 11.3 2011-12 153A/143

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

56,500 6 6,61,200 6,61,200 80,660 11.3 800 11.4.1 2009-10 153A/143(3) 856060 10,10,152 11.3 27,50,684 27,50,680 8,84,472 11.4.1 2010-11 153A/143(3) 923110 25,000 6 29,66,078 29,66,080 20,17,968 11.3 2011-12 153A/143

SHARDA STEEL TRADERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 111, 112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11,2011-12, 2012-13, 2014-15 )

56,500 6 6,61,200 6,61,200 80,660 11.3 800 11.4.1 2009-10 153A/143(3) 856060 10,10,152 11.3 27,50,684 27,50,680 8,84,472 11.4.1 2010-11 153A/143(3) 923110 25,000 6 29,66,078 29,66,080 20,17,968 11.3 2011-12 153A/143

RAHUL TYAGI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.113/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2016-17 Rahul Tyagi Golden Homes 13, New Vip Club, Shankar Nagar, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan: Aitpt6198H

56(2)(vii)(b) r.ws.50C(2), when 'actual purchase consideration' is less than the 'stamp duty value', matter may (shall) be referred to DVO for valuation; without following the procedure laid down in third proviso to sec56(2)(vii)(b) rws. 50C(2), is unsustainable in law and is liable to be set aside to file

GAJRAJ GIRI, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, the assessee's appeal is allowed in terms of my observations above

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 222/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Gajraj Giri S/O. Raghuraj Giri, Sai Mandir Road, Jaharbhata, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495 001 Pan : Afgpg0112E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

vii)(b)(ii) ignoring the fact land is agricultural land. 5. That the Ld. CIT(Appeal) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 2934000/- ignoring the fact that the Land is held as stock in trade and the provisions of 56(2) are not applicable to stock in trade. 6. The appellant reserves the right to add, alter and omit