M/S PREM PRAKASH MANDAL SEWA TRUST,BALODA BAZAR(C.G0 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) -1, RAIPUR (CG)

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pawan Singh

reassessment proceedings is to be treated as null & void & is liable to be quashed. 2. That the ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the denial of exemption

PRAMILA GOKULDAS DAGA GIRLS COLLEGE, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee trust in ITA

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 546 & 547/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Pramila Gokuldas Daga Girls College Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Aaatp4369D

exempt u/s.10(23)(c)(iiiad) of the Act, therefore, there was no justification for the A.O to have held the same as unexplained cash deposits specifically when the reassessment

PRAMILA GOKULDAS DAGA GIRLS COLLEGE, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee trust in ITA

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 546 & 547/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Pramila Gokuldas Daga Girls College Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Aaatp4369D

exempt u/s.10(23)(c)(iiiad) of the Act, therefore, there was no justification for the A.O to have held the same as unexplained cash deposits specifically when the reassessment

RAIPUR REALTY PVT LTD, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 (1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.241/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Raipur Realty Pvt. Ltd. E-76, G.K. Chambers, Sector-2, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aahcr0621C ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

exemption u/s.10(37) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) read with Section 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Reassessment

HOLY HEARTS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.187/Rpr/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 Holy Heart Educational Society Civil Lines, Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aaaah2904B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Laxmi Sharma & Shri Vimal Agrawal, Cas Revenue By : Shri G.N Singh, Sr. Dr

reassessment proceeding without having any tangible material in his possession for making 'reason to believe' for such alleged escapement of income of Rs.54,17,572/- by misapprehending the applicability of 85% utilization for claiming exemption

MADHU GOYAL, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.496/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2014-15 Smt. Madhu Goyal D-36, Wallfort City, Bhatagaon, Raipur-492 001 (C.G) Pan: Aeypg1038E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

reassessment proceedings since there is escapement of income. 7. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee countering the afore-stated contention submitted that the return of income does not have any provision to directly reflect the amount which has been received by the assessee i.e. 9,27,878/-. The provision of exempt

SHRI SHRI KETAN MOOLCHAND SHAH, BHILAI,BHILAI(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,-2(1),BHILAI, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2008-2009 Assessment Year: 2010-2011

exempt u/s.2(14) of the Act and the Assessing Officer reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment and issued notice u/s.148 of the Act and assessee filed letter on 5.8.2013 to treat the return of income filed earlier in compliance to reassessment

SHRI SHAILESH ARVIND SHAH,BHILAI(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2(1), BHILAI(CG)

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2008-2009 Assessment Year: 2010-2011

exempt u/s.2(14) of the Act and the Assessing Officer reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment and issued notice u/s.148 of the Act and assessee filed letter on 5.8.2013 to treat the return of income filed earlier in compliance to reassessment

SHRI KETAN MOOLCHAND SHAH,BHILAI(CG) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2008-2009 Assessment Year: 2010-2011

exempt u/s.2(14) of the Act and the Assessing Officer reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment and issued notice u/s.148 of the Act and assessee filed letter on 5.8.2013 to treat the return of income filed earlier in compliance to reassessment

BALAJI EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, BHILAI,BHILAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.594/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2016-17

reassessment is quashed thereafter all other proceedings becomes non-est in the eyes of law. As the legal issue has been answered in favour of the assessee therefore the grounds on merits becomes academic only. 15. As per the aforesaid terms the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee stands allowed. 6 Balaji Education Development Society Vs. The ITO (Exemption

HARJINDAR SINGH BAL,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), BHILAI

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 57/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Shri Harjindar Singh Bal Ward- No.29, Hospital Colony, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan : Adepb7178F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-2(1), Bhilai (C.G.). ……""यथ" / Respondent

exempted income, the claimed expenditure in the return which is Rs.45861, is not allowable. Hence, I have reason to believe that the income of Rs.845861/- (Rs.800000/- + Rs.45861/-) which is chargeable to tax, has escaped assessment within the meaning of Para (b) of Explanation 2 of Section 147 of the I.T Act, 1961. Thus, the case is fit for reassessment

PAWAN KUMAR CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI vs. ITO,WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as above

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 685, 686 & 687/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward Dhamtari, Gandhi Chowk, Kurud, Shankardan Road, Village:Haraftarai, Dhamtari-493663, Chhattisgarh. Dhamtari-493773, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aqdpc2033J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Veekas S Sharma, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am:

reassessment proceedings under Section 147 based on non-existent fact and factually incorrect premise is, therefore, bad-in-law and the consequent addition is unsustainable. 7. The Learned CIT (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.13,973/- as interest income under the head "Income from Other Sources," despite the fact that the said amount falls below

PAWAN KUMAR CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI vs. ITO, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as above

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 685, 686 & 687/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward Dhamtari, Gandhi Chowk, Kurud, Shankardan Road, Village:Haraftarai, Dhamtari-493663, Chhattisgarh. Dhamtari-493773, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aqdpc2033J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Veekas S Sharma, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am:

reassessment proceedings under Section 147 based on non-existent fact and factually incorrect premise is, therefore, bad-in-law and the consequent addition is unsustainable. 7. The Learned CIT (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.13,973/- as interest income under the head "Income from Other Sources," despite the fact that the said amount falls below

PAWAN KUMAR CHANDRAKAR, DHAMTARI,DHAMTARI vs. ITO, WARD-DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes as above

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 685, 686 & 687/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2015-16) Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward Dhamtari, Gandhi Chowk, Kurud, Shankardan Road, Village:Haraftarai, Dhamtari-493663, Chhattisgarh. Dhamtari-493773, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aqdpc2033J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Veekas S Sharma, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am:

reassessment proceedings under Section 147 based on non-existent fact and factually incorrect premise is, therefore, bad-in-law and the consequent addition is unsustainable. 7. The Learned CIT (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.13,973/- as interest income under the head "Income from Other Sources," despite the fact that the said amount falls below

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIVIL LINES, RAIPUR vs. SANDEEP JHABAK, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.418/Rpr/2024 Co No.16/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Income Tax Officer-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Sandeep Jhabak M/S. Allied Traders, Jhabak Bada, Near Tatyapara, Kamasipara (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Adnpj2221L ……""यथ" / Respondent

exemption is connected with the user of land for a purpose which must be agriculture?" 7. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case Id. CIT(A) was justified in not calling the remand report from AO on the written submission of assessee, as the assessee has not submitted this reply of the SCN dated 14.12.2019 issued

BHARAT BENEFICATION & POWER PVT. LTD., RAIGARH,RAIGARH vs. PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 336/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19)

reassessment proceedings, AO raised specific query vide letter dated 25.08.2022 (PN 12 to 17 of PB), query no. 4. AO required assessee to fulfill sec. 68. ii) Reply submitted by assessee, placed at PN 25 to 27 of PB, relevant reply at PN 26, para no.4. All documents in terms of sec. 68 filed. Onus discharged by assessee. iii) Documents

SRI SAI BABA SANSTHAN, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.247 & 248/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 Sri Sai Baba Sansthan Sai Mandir, Avenue-B, Civic Center, Sector-6, Bhilai-490 006 (C.G.) Pan: Aadts8938G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Exemption-Ii, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

Exemption-II, Raipur ITA Nos.247 & 248/RPR/2025 12. There may even be a situation where the Ld. Counsel for the assessee may assail a legal ground before the Tribunal following the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Thermal Power Company Ltd. Ltd. Vs. CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383 (SC) with a contention that irrespective

SRI SAI BABA SANSTHAN, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.247 & 248/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 Sri Sai Baba Sansthan Sai Mandir, Avenue-B, Civic Center, Sector-6, Bhilai-490 006 (C.G.) Pan: Aadts8938G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Exemption-Ii, Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

Exemption-II, Raipur ITA Nos.247 & 248/RPR/2025 12. There may even be a situation where the Ld. Counsel for the assessee may assail a legal ground before the Tribunal following the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of National Thermal Power Company Ltd. Ltd. Vs. CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383 (SC) with a contention that irrespective

BHUWANESHWAR SHUKLA, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BHILAI, DURG

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of accordingly

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 141 & 142/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Bhuwaneshwar Shukla Lig 12/06, Mansarowar Colony, Shiv Mandir, Bhilai-3, Durg-490 021 Pan: Ccips5734D ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Durg ……""यथ" / Respondent

Exemption) & Ors. Vs. Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (supra) as has been relied on by the Ld. Sr. DR is clearly focused on the parameter of compliance. However, in the present case as demonstrated in the record, it is not that of compliance and rather, it is ambiguity in issuance of notice and denying an opportunity to the assessee