Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur47 Bangalore18 Indore16 Surat10 Chandigarh10 Pune7 Ahmedabad7 Mumbai6 Chennai5 Delhi4 Cochin3 Hyderabad3 Allahabad2 Raipur2 Rajkot2 Kolkata1 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1478 Section 2637 Section 683 Section 271(1)(c)3

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR PATEL,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

ITA 212/RPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 212/Rpr/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18)

For Appellant: Shri Sakshi Gopal Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR

Section 115BSection 147Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 68

penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Act, was not applicable for the Asstt. Year 2017-18. Ld. PCIT further observed that, it is a well-known fact that from the Asstt. Year 2017-18 onwards in cases where income determined includes any income referred to in section, 68, 69, 69A, 69B

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR PATEL,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

SHRI VIJAY KUMAR PATEL,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), BHILAI, BHILAI vs. MANISH KUMAR MEHTA, HUF, DURG