Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai53 Nagpur7 Varanasi6 Delhi5 Kolkata3 Chandigarh2 Pune1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 683 Section 56(2)(viib)2

CHHATTISGARH METALIKS AND ALLOYS PVT. LTD.,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -3(3), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 114/RPR/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur13 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri G D Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.114/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Chhattisgarh Metaliks & Alloys Private Limited Mohini B-5, Merlin Jayashree Vihar, Mandi Gate, Pandri Tarai, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aadcc9242J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-3(3), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Mahawar, CAFor Respondent: None

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

271(1)(c) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 08.07.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us: “1.That CIT Appeals-NFAC has erred in both fact and in law in confirming the penalty of Rs.10,95,149/- made by Assessing Officer