BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai280Delhi263Karnataka117Jaipur49Ahmedabad42Kolkata36Calcutta34Chennai29Indore29Pune27Bangalore24Visakhapatnam15Chandigarh14Cuttack12Panaji12Lucknow12Hyderabad10Agra8Guwahati7Cochin7Surat7Rajkot4Amritsar4Allahabad2Raipur2SC2Telangana2Jodhpur1Patna1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)7Section 683Section 153C3Section 143(3)2Section 56(2)(viib)2Penalty2Addition to Income2

OMAX MINERALS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 420/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliassessment Year : 2015-16 Omax Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Office Block-51, Omax Minerals Private Limited, Krishna Vihar, Raigarh 496001, Chhattisgarh, India ……….Appellant Pan: Aabco5774H

For Appellant: Mr Subash Agrawal, [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 132Section 133ASection 139Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

260/- was made and consequential assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act was passed assessing total income at ₹2,87,45,000/-. In view thereof penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of particular and furnished inaccurate particulars of income were initiated. In the course of such penalty proceedings the notices including show cause notice issued

CHHATTISGARH METALIKS AND ALLOYS PVT. LTD.,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -3(3), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 114/RPR/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur13 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri G D Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.114/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Chhattisgarh Metaliks & Alloys Private Limited Mohini B-5, Merlin Jayashree Vihar, Mandi Gate, Pandri Tarai, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aadcc9242J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-3(3), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Mahawar, CAFor Respondent: None
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

271(1)(c) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 08.07.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us: “1.That CIT Appeals-NFAC has erred in both fact and in law in confirming the penalty of Rs.10,95,149/- made by Assessing Officer