Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194A(3)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore33 Mumbai25 Delhi16 Hyderabad8 Chandigarh7 Jaipur5 Jabalpur5 Chennai4 Ahmedabad3 Pune3 Kolkata2 Raipur2 Dehradun2 Cuttack1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2 Section 43B2 Section 402 Deduction2 TDS2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2

DY.C.I.T. 1 vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 222/BIL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury,Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.222& 318/Rpr/2014 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11& 2011-12

For Appellant: ShriMakarand Joshi and ShriAniruddhaKavimandanFor Respondent: Smt. AnubhaTahGoel

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

3. Whether in law and on facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition on account of disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act 1961 of interest and finance charges of Rs.4,66,658/- paid to various NBFCs by the assessee as the assesse failed to deduct TDS? 4. Whether

DY.C.I.T. 1 vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)

DY.C.I.T. 1, BHILAI(CG) vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)

DY.C.I.T. 1 vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)

DY.C.I.T. 1, BHILAI(CG) vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI(CG)