BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi47Jaipur39Mumbai34Bangalore27Visakhapatnam11Pune10Chennai9Cochin9Ahmedabad7Lucknow7Telangana6Kolkata6Indore5Cuttack5Hyderabad5Surat4Raipur4Nagpur3Jodhpur2Amritsar2Chandigarh2Karnataka1SC1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 684Addition to Income4Section 103Section 80C3Section 143(2)3Deduction3Section 194D2Section 143(1)2Section 1542Section 22

NILESH KUMAR AGRAWAL,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(5), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 116/RPR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.116/Rpr/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Shri Nilesh Kumar Agrawal, Prop. M/S. Friends Construction, House No.107-108, Opp. Ravi Shankar, University Gate, Amanaka, Raipur (C.G.)-492 010 Pan : Afcpa2198G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-4(5), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri G. N Singh, DR
Section 143(2)Section 22Section 23(1)Section 23(1)(a)Section 80C

80C is not allowable" without referring any provision of the Act or judicial pronouncement in this regard. 5) The appellant reserves the right to add, amend, or alter any ground or grounds of appeal at the time of hearing.” 3 Shri Nilesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. ITO-4(5) 2. Succinctly stated, the assessee who is engaged in the business

2
Exemption2
House Property2

PRIYESH SINGHANIA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 462/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.462/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Priyesh Singhania 730/1, Radha Kunj, Opposite Vip Guest House, Pahuna, Shankar Nagar Main Road, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Aoups7838A ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 194D

House, Pahuna, Shankar Nagar Main Road, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 PAN: AOUPS7838A ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/s. The Income Tax Officer, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Mahendra Kumar Agrawal, CA Revenue by : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 17.09.2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date of Pronouncement : 18.09.2025 2 Priyesh Singhania

SHABD PRAKASH LATH,,BILASPUR(CG) vs. ITO, WARD- 1(1),, BILASPUR(CG)

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 89/BIL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 44ASection 68Section 80C

house property, interest income from bank and two sources of business income i.e. income from plying bus and letting out Tata 407 on hire charge basis owned by him. The return of income for A.Y 2009-10 was filed on 02.12.2009 declaring income at Rs. 1,88,750/- after claiming deduction u/s 80C of the Income

RAGHVENDRA SINGH THAKUR, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

The appeal is allowed

ITA 242/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.242/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 Raghvendra Singh Thakur, H.No.238, Sarona, Tatibandh, Raipur, 492001, Chhattisgarh Pan: Akbpt7616E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Veekas S. Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(14)(ii)Section 69rSection 80C

Section 69r.w.s 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Learned CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre. Delhi has erred in confirming the same as the addition is contrary to facts, law and legislative intent inasmuch as the cash deposited belonged to the partnership firm of the assessee which was substantiated by documentary evidences that were disregarded