KAVITA BUDHIA,NEAR MAA SHARDA HOSPITAL RING ROAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KORBA, MAHANADI COMPLEX, NIHARIKA
Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of over aforesaid observations
ITA 171/RPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 May 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 171/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2016-17)
For Appellant: None (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250
property in the F.Y. 2003-
04 for Rs.2,78,000/- and further made construction during F.Y. 2006-07 to 2008-
09. The Id. AO has not given any rebate for cost of acquisition and cost of improvement which is highly unjustified and bad in law.
5. Aggrieved with the aforesaid additions, assessee preferred an appeal before
