Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

117 results for “disallowance”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,630 Delhi3,182 Bangalore1,489 Chennai1,483 Kolkata1,088 Ahmedabad516 Hyderabad412 Pune293 Jaipur254 Chandigarh205 Cochin144 Indore125 Raipur117 Lucknow115 Visakhapatnam115 Rajkot100 Surat92 Nagpur72 Ranchi71 Cuttack70 Jodhpur52 Patna43 Karnataka43 Guwahati35 Agra31 Panaji27 Amritsar26 Jabalpur26 Dehradun24 Allahabad13 Calcutta11 Kerala11 SC5 Varanasi5 Telangana4 Rajasthan4 Punjab & Haryana3 Gauhati1 Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)116 Section 143(3)75 Addition to Income68 Disallowance65 Section 15458 TDS54 Deduction42 Section 26331 Section 271(1)(c)30 Section 40

SHRI JAGANNATH TRANSPORT CORPORATION, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of over aforesaid observations

ITA 162/RPR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur07 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 162/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2023-24)

For Appellant: Shri Bikram Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 250

TDS claimed in ITR of Rs. 1,49,74,282/- oy the CPC and disallowed the TDS of Rs. 23,10,053/-is correct

SURYA LAND DEVELOPERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Showing 1–20 of 117 · Page 1 of 6

27

Natural Justice22

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 328/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur03 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Judicial Ember

For Appellant: Shri Vikaas S. Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr.-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 40

TDS, the disallowance ought to have been restricted to Rs.94,956/- (i.e. 30% of Rs.3,16,520/- ). Hence, the disallowance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1(1), RAIPUR vs. BHARAT AGRO INDUSTRIES, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed as above

ITA 511/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am

For Appellant: Shri Jalaj Prakash, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR

Section 133(6)Section 250Section 40A(3)

disallowance of Rs.74,291/-on account of interest on late payment of TDS in view of judgment of ITAT, Delhi

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1)), BHILAI vs. SHRI SANJAY JAIN, BHILAI

In the result ground no. 06 of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 55/RPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No: Ita 55/Rpr/2020 (Assessment Years:2014-15) Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, V Shri Sanjay Jain, Bhilai S C/O M/S Sidhharth Industries, Plot No. 38, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, C.G. Pan: Aet Pj1859D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ravi Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 23-08-2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 09-11-2023 Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 68

disallowing the expenditure under the head ‘Bank Commission and Charges’ for the reason that the appellant did not deducted TDS

SHRI LAXMAN BHAI DAHYA BHAI PATEL,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 29/RPR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur29 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 29/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Shri Laxman Bhai Dahya Bhai Patel Padmanabhpur, Patel Complex, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan : Aafl8291J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(1), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Bikram Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194CSection 40

Disallowance u/s.40(a)(ia) out of Tendu 15,98,210/- 6 Patta Plucking expenses for non deduction of TDS Disallowance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , RAIPUR vs. GRAND MOTORS, RAIPUR

ITA 544/RPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Grand Motors, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Lodhi Para Chowk, Pandri, Raipur Raipur, 492001, Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Aagfg8524P

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Khatri, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT- DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 246A(1)(a)Section 250Section 40Section 43B

disallowed Rs.7,42,500/-as expense on Rent on account of non- deduction of TDS thereon. The appellant has requested

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL)-I, RAIPUR vs. MESERS CHHATTISGARH STEEL & POWER LIMITED, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 92/RPR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.91 & 92/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Chhattisgarh Steel & Power Limited. 142, Sahid Smarak, G.E Road, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aaccc7479G ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Ms. Puja Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40

disallowances made by the AO for failure to make TDS on wheeling charges is not sustainable, hence the disallowance u/s 40 (a)(ia) of the Act is deleted

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I, RAIPUR vs. MESERS CHHATTISGARH STEEL & POWER LIMITED, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 91/RPR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.91 & 92/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Chhattisgarh Steel & Power Limited. 142, Sahid Smarak, G.E Road, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aaccc7479G ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Ms. Puja Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40

disallowances made by the AO for failure to make TDS on wheeling charges is not sustainable, hence the disallowance u/s 40 (a)(ia) of the Act is deleted

XANDER FINANCE PVT. LTD., MUMBAI,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 549/RPR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur31 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 549/Rpr/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Taranuum Verma, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 205Section 234Section 234BSection 250

disallowed TDS claim, party wise ledgers, Bank 15 Xander Finance Private Limited vs ACIT, Central-1(1), Raipur statements etc., all such

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1) BILASPUR, BILASPUR vs. RAJSWAY DIRECT TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED, BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 257/RPR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur11 Dec 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 257/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bilaspur .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Rajsway Direct Trading Private Limited, 1154, Ward No.12, Minimata Nagar, Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.)-495 001 Pan : Aahcr9787K

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 69C

TDS, the same, thus, was disallowed vide order passed u/s. 144 r.w.s. 144B dated 30.08.2022. Accordingly, the A.O. vide his order

M/S SMS SHIVNATH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,DURG(CG) vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 107/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.87/Rpr/2017 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Acit-2(1), Bhilai Vs M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.107/Rpr/2016 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Vs Pr.Cit-2, Raipur Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, Adv. & MukeshFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Lahiri, CIT-DR

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 36Section 80ISection 80l

TDS under law such disallowance would ultimately increase assessee‟s profits from business of developing housing project. The ultimate profits

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-2(1)BHILAI, BHILAI(CG) vs. M/S SMS SHIVNATH INFRASSTRUCTURE PVT LTD., DURG, DURG(CG)

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 87/BIL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.87/Rpr/2017 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Acit-2(1), Bhilai Vs M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.107/Rpr/2016 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Vs Pr.Cit-2, Raipur Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, Adv. & MukeshFor Respondent: Shri Debashis Lahiri, CIT-DR

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 36Section 80ISection 80l

TDS under law such disallowance would ultimately increase assessee‟s profits from business of developing housing project. The ultimate profits

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 208/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAUNA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 203/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 205/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAUNA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 204/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 206/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 207/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKRI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHARSIWA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 202/RPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the amount of TDS on commission received on paddy procurement business, as under: Sl. Particulars Amount in Rs. No. 1. Disallowance

BARBRIK DEE VEE JV, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 313/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 313/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Barbarik Dee Vee Jv A-24, Ashoka Millenium, Ring Road No.1, Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aacab7461R .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-3(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Mahawar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 201Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)

TDS payable. Observing, that the interest paid by the assessee was penal in nature, the A.O called upon the assessee to show cause as to why the same may not be disallowed