BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 92Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi182Mumbai166Kolkata65Bangalore53Pune25Chennai20Ahmedabad10Jaipur8Hyderabad6Amritsar4Indore4Surat3Panaji2Karnataka2Calcutta2Raipur2Telangana1Cochin1Guwahati1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 115B9Section 40A(2)(a)4Section 143(3)2Disallowance2

VIVRN FOODS PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 364/RPR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur25 Jun 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.364/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2024-25 Vivrn Foods Private Limited C/O. Rajkumar Mundra, Village-Sarona, Raipur-492 009 (C.G.) Pan: Aahcv4005G

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)

disallowance of claim of lower rate of tax under section 115BAB of the Income-tax Act,1961, and upholding the rejection of Form-10ID by the ld. CPC, Bangalore, without appreciating that the appellant had duly complied with the conditions prescribed under the said section and exercised option in the year of commencement of actual manufacturing activity as per provisions

M/S BROTHERS R. KOTHARI,KANKER vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 246/RPR/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 246/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Brothers R. Kothari, Shop No.111, Main Road, Kanker, Near Sbi, Kanker (C.G.) Pan : Aagfb2424F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, DR
Section 143(3)Section 40A(2)(a)Section 92BSection 92F

disallowance, on account of any 5 M/s. Brothers R Kothari Vs. DCIT expenditure being excessive or unreasonable having regard to the fair market value, shall be made in respect of a specified domestic transaction referred to in section 92BA, if such transaction is at arm's length price as defined in clause (ii) of section 92F