BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

71 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai251Bangalore170Cochin131Pune112Delhi77Chennai75Raipur71Panaji56Visakhapatnam52Ahmedabad48Kolkata48Surat42Hyderabad41Jaipur30Chandigarh30Rajkot22Indore16Nagpur10Varanasi10Lucknow9Amritsar9Cuttack8Karnataka7Telangana7SC3Kerala3Dehradun2Allahabad2Jodhpur2Jabalpur2Guwahati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)135Section 143(3)83Deduction70Addition to Income53Section 80P30Section 80P(2)(a)26TDS23Disallowance23Natural Justice19Section 80P(2)(d)

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,BALODA BAZAR(C.G0 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 303/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,SINGHOLA,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 243/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)

Showing 1–20 of 71 · Page 1 of 4

18
Limitation/Time-bar9
Section 2508
Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,RAMPUR,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 245/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,JOSHILAMATI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER -1,, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 238/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 117/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 114/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 115/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 116/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 119/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 120/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 121/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. TJE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 305/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,GHATULA,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 244/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,SOMNI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 242/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

HE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT, SURGI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 246/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

M/S GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 144/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction of the dividend income of Rs. 1,16,224/- that was earned on the shares of Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, i.e, a co-operative Bank u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that both the lower authorities had failed to appreciate the facts of the case

THE GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 104/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

iv) That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s.80P(2) made by the A.O at Rs.5,54,758/- ( i.e. Rs.6,04,758 minus Rs.50,000) being gross profit from PDS business. (v) The ld. CIT(A) has erred in disallowing the deduction u/s.80P(2) of Rs.23,15,154 & Rs. 255 being miscellaneous income & entry

GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 121/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

iv) That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s.80P(2) made by the A.O at Rs.5,54,758/- ( i.e. Rs.6,04,758 minus Rs.50,000) being gross profit from PDS business. (v) The ld. CIT(A) has erred in disallowing the deduction u/s.80P(2) of Rs.23,15,154 & Rs. 255 being miscellaneous income & entry

GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 125/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

iv) That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s.80P(2) made by the A.O at Rs.5,54,758/- ( i.e. Rs.6,04,758 minus Rs.50,000) being gross profit from PDS business. (v) The ld. CIT(A) has erred in disallowing the deduction u/s.80P(2) of Rs.23,15,154 & Rs. 255 being miscellaneous income & entry

GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 126/BIL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

iv) That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s.80P(2) made by the A.O at Rs.5,54,758/- ( i.e. Rs.6,04,758 minus Rs.50,000) being gross profit from PDS business. (v) The ld. CIT(A) has erred in disallowing the deduction u/s.80P(2) of Rs.23,15,154 & Rs. 255 being miscellaneous income & entry