GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, CHAMPAJHAR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

d) of the Act. 4. Disallowance of the assessee’s claim for Rs.1,66,716/- deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the Act. After making the aforesaid disallowances, the A.O vide his order u/s. 143(3) of the Act, dated 23.11.2019 assessed the total income of the assessee society at Rs. 2,45,216/-. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKRI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHARSIWA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

d) of the Act. 4. Disallowance of the assessee’s claim for Rs.1,66,716/- deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the Act. After making the aforesaid disallowances, the A.O vide his order u/s. 143(3) of the Act, dated 23.11.2019 assessed the total income of the assessee society at Rs. 2,45,216/-. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKRI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHARSIWA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAUNA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAUNA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

section (4) of Sec. 80P was that the co- operative banks which were functioning at par with other banks would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(4) of the Act. Insofar the reliance placed by the Pr. CIT on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale

CHHATTISGARH SAHAKARI SAKH SAMITI MARYADIT, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No 284, 286 &

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No.284,285,286,287/Rpr/2023) (Assessment Year:2013-14,2017-18,2018-19,2020-21)

section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a "primary agricultural credit society" or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural devlopement bank hence this was withdrawn hence intrest recived from co-operative bank claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) is justified, as before 01/04/2007 co-operative bank where also assessed as co-operative society

CHHATTISGARH SAHAKARI SAKH SAMITI MARYADIT, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No 284, 286 &

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No.284,285,286,287/Rpr/2023) (Assessment Year:2013-14,2017-18,2018-19,2020-21)

section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a "primary agricultural credit society" or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural devlopement bank hence this was withdrawn hence intrest recived from co-operative bank claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) is justified, as before 01/04/2007 co-operative bank where also assessed as co-operative society

CHHATTISGARH SAHAKARI SAKH SAMITI MARYADIT, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No 284, 286 &

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No.284,285,286,287/Rpr/2023) (Assessment Year:2013-14,2017-18,2018-19,2020-21)

section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a "primary agricultural credit society" or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural devlopement bank hence this was withdrawn hence intrest recived from co-operative bank claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) is justified, as before 01/04/2007 co-operative bank where also assessed as co-operative society

CHHATTISGARH SAHAKARI SAKH SAMITI MARYADIT, BHILAI,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No 284, 286 &

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No.284,285,286,287/Rpr/2023) (Assessment Year:2013-14,2017-18,2018-19,2020-21)

section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a "primary agricultural credit society" or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural devlopement bank hence this was withdrawn hence intrest recived from co-operative bank claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) is justified, as before 01/04/2007 co-operative bank where also assessed as co-operative society

SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI SIRRI, ,BALOD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.109/Rpr/2026 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2016-17 Sewa Sahkari Samiti Sirri, Village & Post:Sirri, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattsigarh, 491221 Pan: Aagas8961H .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

disallowed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. The A.O held of the Act, a Co- operative Credit that as per Section 80P

VRIHTAKAR SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT SURGI,RAJNANDGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON, RAJNANDGAON

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.105/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2018-19

disallowed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. The A.O held that as per Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, a Co-operative

SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI LATABOD,LATABOD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RISALI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.5/Rpr/2026 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2016-17 Sewa Sahakari Samiti Latabod K-6, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aahas1552M

disallowed u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. The A.O held that as per Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, a Co-operative

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR vs. CHHATTISGARH RAJYA SAHAKARI AWAS SANGH (MARYADIT), RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 206/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Awas Sangh Maryadit C-191, Tagore Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aaaac5903F ……""यथ" / Respondent

section 80P(2)(d) deals with the eligible deduction in this behalf. 3. Any other ground that may be adduced at the time of hearing.” 2. On the basis of information received by the A.O. that though the assessee cooperative society had taxable income but had not filed its return of income for the year under consideration, the A.O. initiated

SHRI DURGA GRAM SERVICE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED MERHANA,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.535/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Durga Gram Service Co-Operative Society Limited Village: Merhana Ghumarwin, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh-174 028 Pan: Aagas5856D

disallowed 7 Shri Durga Gram Service Co-Operative Society Limited Vs. ITO, Ward-Bilaspur u/s.80P(2)(d) of the Act. The A.O held that as per Section 80P

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHORRA,GARIYABAND vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 25/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Adim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Dhorra Ground Floor, Main Road Dhorra, Gariyaband(C.G)-493889 Pan: Aabaa7991C .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Acit, Circle 1(1) Revenue Building, Civil Lines Raipur (C.G.)-492001 ……""यथ" / Respondent

section which kindly be allowed. 3 5. That under the facts and the law the Ld.CIT (Appeals) NFAC, Delhi further erred in confirming the rejection of claim of the appellant for deduction of commission income earned at Rs. 2,73,661 u/s. 80P(2). Prayed that the above income is deductible u/s. 80P(2). 6.That Under the facts