BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

75 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai536Bangalore425Pune296Cochin237Chennai192Panaji108Delhi104Ahmedabad97Kolkata75Raipur75Nagpur60Visakhapatnam59Jaipur57Hyderabad54Chandigarh45Surat38Lucknow38Rajkot30Indore20Amritsar16Karnataka16Jodhpur12Varanasi10Jabalpur8Kerala7Cuttack7Telangana6SC4Allahabad2Calcutta2Orissa1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)136Section 143(3)88Deduction71Addition to Income58Section 80P30Section 80P(2)(a)28Disallowance27Section 80P(2)(d)24TDS22Natural Justice

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,SINGHOLA,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 243/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

M/S GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 144/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)

Showing 1–20 of 75 · Page 1 of 4

19
Section 25012
Section 80p(2)(d)8
Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,RAMPUR,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 245/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,BALODA BAZAR(C.G0 vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 303/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,JOSHILAMATI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER -1,, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 238/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 117/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 114/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 115/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 116/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 119/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 120/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,DHAMTARI(C.G) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI(C.G)

ITA 121/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE GRAMIN SEVA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. TJE INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(3), RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 305/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,GHATULA,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 244/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

THE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT,SOMNI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 242/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

HE SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITIT MARYADIT, SURGI,RAJNANDGAON vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-2, RAJNANDGAON

ITA 246/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battull

Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI (MARYADIT), GAURBHAT,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 87/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (written submissions)For Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

b)............................................................................................ (c)............................................................................................ (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co-operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income;” On a perusal of Sec. 80P(2)(d), it can safely be gathered that interest income derived by an assessee co-operative society from its investments

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKRI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHARSIWA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 89/RPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (written submissions)For Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

b)............................................................................................ (c)............................................................................................ (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co-operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income;” On a perusal of Sec. 80P(2)(d), it can safely be gathered that interest income derived by an assessee co-operative society from its investments

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, CHAMPAJHAR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 88/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (written submissions)For Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

b)............................................................................................ (c)............................................................................................ (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co-operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income;” On a perusal of Sec. 80P(2)(d), it can safely be gathered that interest income derived by an assessee co-operative society from its investments

THE GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 104/BIL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

Section 143(3)

disallowed assessee’s claim for deduction as regards the balance amount of profit. Assailing the restriction of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) to 35% of its income of Rs. 16,21,218/-, it is the claim of the ld. A.R before us that the same is highly exorbitant, for the reason, that the assessee