BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Mclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai125Delhi67Bangalore21Chennai11Kolkata9Ahmedabad6Pune5Karnataka5Raipur5Jaipur4Telangana2Punjab & Haryana2SC2Hyderabad1Orissa1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Section 14710Section 115B9Section 575Section 1485Disallowance5Section 80I4Deduction4Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income

VIVRN FOODS PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 364/RPR/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur25 Jun 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.364/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2024-25 Vivrn Foods Private Limited C/O. Rajkumar Mundra, Village-Sarona, Raipur-492 009 (C.G.) Pan: Aahcv4005G

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)

disallowance of claim of lower rate of tax under section 115BAB of the Income-tax Act,1961, and upholding the rejection of Form-10ID by the ld. CPC, Bangalore, without appreciating that the appellant had duly complied with the conditions prescribed under the said section and exercised option in the year of commencement of actual manufacturing activity as per provisions

4
Section 194C3
Section 1443

SHOBHA DEVI NATHANI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -4(3), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 4/RPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 04/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Shobha Devi Nathani 11/1, Shree Niwas, Gali No.8, New Shanti Nagar, Shankar Nagar, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan: Abipn1316K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(3), Raipur (C.G.). ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gitesh Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 57

disallowed the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s. 57 of the Act. 11. Before adverting any further, I deem it fit to cull out the “reasons to believe” which had formed the very basis for reopening of the assessee’s case, as under: “Reasons for the belief that income has escaped assessment The assessee filed return of income declaring total

NALINI PARWANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 249/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 249/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Nalini Parwani C/O. G.K Automobiles P. Ltd. Opp. Kabir Nagar, Gate No.2. Ring Road-2, Sondongri, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aeqpp5635N .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Raipur (C.G.)

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Kumar Chawda, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 28Section 57

disallowed the same and assessed the income of the assessee at Rs.13,84,328/-. 5. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. 6. The assessee, being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals), has carried the matter in appeal. 7. I have heard the ld. Authorized representatives of both the parties

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), RAIPUR vs. M/S VARSHA CONSTRUCTION, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed in terms of my aforesaid observations

ITA 111/RPR/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur25 Nov 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.111/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Varsha Construction 2Nd Floor, 25-26, Millennium Plaza, Raipur (C.G.) Pan :Aaefv8399M ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sakshi Gopal Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194C

Section 147 of the Act, therefore, I shall first deal with the same. 9. On a perusal of the records, it transpires that the concluded assessment in the case of the assessee which was earlier framed by the A.O vide his order passed u/s.143(3), dated 26.12.2009 was, thereafter, reopened u/s. 147 of the Act on the basis

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG) vs. SHRI SHRI RAKESH PANDEY, RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 8/BIL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Jamlappa D Battullआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita Nos. 08 & 09/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80I

80M was wrongly allowed, and, therefore, he was of the opinion that the income has ITA No.1212/Mum/2019 A.Y. 2012-13 M/s Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. DCIT-10(2)(2) escaped assessment. Though, in the notice respondent No. 1 has used the phrase "reason to believe", admittedly between the date of the order of assessment sought to be reopened