BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 747clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi223Mumbai203Jaipur45Chennai38Kolkata36Ahmedabad34Bangalore32Chandigarh20Pune19Lucknow10Indore9Hyderabad9Surat8Visakhapatnam5Amritsar5Ranchi4Panaji4Cuttack3SC3Cochin2Patna2Raipur2Calcutta1Jodhpur1Nagpur1Rajkot1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 80I4Section 143(3)3Section 403Section 194C2Deduction2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

SHRI LAXMAN BHAI DAHYA BHAI PATEL,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 29/RPR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur29 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 29/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Shri Laxman Bhai Dahya Bhai Patel Padmanabhpur, Patel Complex, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan : Aafl8291J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(1), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Bikram Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 194CSection 40

Section 194C of the Act, therefore, the A.O disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act 30% of the said expenditure and worked out a disallowance of Rs.15,98,210/-(sic). However, the A.O while culminating the assessment vide his order passed u/s.143(3) dated 30.12.2017, inter alia, disallowed, viz. (i) assessee’s claim for deduction of tendu patta plucking

BALDEV INFRA PROJECTS PVT LTD,JAGDALPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Dismissed

ITA 208/RPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.208/Rpr/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Baldev Infra Projects Pvt Ltd., The Dy.Commissioner Of Bms House, Motitalab Para, V Income Tax-2(1), Raipur. Jagdalpur (C.G.) S Pan: Aadcb 2123 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri R.B.Doshi – Ar Revenue By Shri G.N.Singh – Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 24/11/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 27/12/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee I.E. Baldev Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., For The A.Y.2013-14 Against The Order Of Ld.Cit(A)-1, Raipur Emanating From The Assessment Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 01.03.2016. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)-1, Raipur Erred In Not Deleting The Disallowance Of Deduction Claimed U/S 80Ib(10) Of The Income-Tax Of Rs.62,46,481/-.

Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80IB(10) of the Income-tax of Rs.62,46,481/-. 2. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax Baldev Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., (Appeal)-1, Raipur is bad in law and on facts.” 2. Brief facts of the case: The Assessee had filed Return of Income showing Nil income for A.Y.2013-14