BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai879Delhi637Chennai248Bangalore216Kolkata196Jaipur103Pune95Ahmedabad88Hyderabad74Chandigarh68Surat48Cuttack36Calcutta35Indore29Rajkot29Allahabad23Amritsar23Karnataka20Guwahati16Panaji16Cochin13Visakhapatnam11Nagpur11Kerala7Agra5Dehradun5Telangana5Lucknow5Raipur4Varanasi4SC3Jodhpur3Jabalpur2Patna2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Section 2(22)(e)6Section 143(2)5Section 14A4Section 404Disallowance4Addition to Income4Deduction3Section 80I2Section 43C

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), RAIPUR vs. SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD SINGHANIA, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 228/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur13 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.228/Rpr/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Income Tax Officer-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Jagdish Prasad Singhania, 14, Singhania Sadan Main Road, Bazarpara, Ward-Tilda, Neora, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Ajkps0565M ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: S/Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(4)

disallowed transportation/hiring charges of Rs.2,08,270/- (supra) booked by the assessee against the names of two transporters, viz. Shri Manoj Kumar Singhania and Smt. Reema Singhania, but had not drawn any adverse inferences in respect of balance amount of transportation/hiring charges of Rs.1,22,95,088/- [ Rs.1,25,03,358/- (-) Rs.2,08,270/-]. On the basis of the aforesaid

2
Deemed Dividend2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR vs. S.P. BUILDCON PVT. LTD., RAIPUR

ITA 35/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur28 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No. 35 & 38/Rpr/2023) (Assessment Year: 2014-15 & 2016-17) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, V S.P. Buildcon Private Limited Circle-1(1), S Ff-06, Shyam Plaza, Pandri Bus Stand, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur Raipur Pan: Aajcs0653H (अपीलाथ" /Applicant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Amit M. Jain, Adv. राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 05-09-2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28-11-2023

For Appellant: Shri Amit M. Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(22)(e)Section 40Section 43C

disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961 in the hands of the assessee company and will be added to the total income of the assessee. 12. With the aforesaid observations of Ld. AO, it was the submission of Ld. Sr. DR that the decision of Ld. CIT(A) was based on the observation that, for applicability

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR vs. S.P. BUILDCON PVT. LTD., RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 38/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur28 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No. 35 & 38/Rpr/2023) (Assessment Year: 2014-15 & 2016-17) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, V S.P. Buildcon Private Limited Circle-1(1), S Ff-06, Shyam Plaza, Pandri Bus Stand, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur Raipur Pan: Aajcs0653H (अपीलाथ" /Applicant) . (""यथ" / Respondent) . िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Amit M. Jain, Adv. राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 05-09-2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28-11-2023

For Appellant: Shri Amit M. Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(22)(e)Section 40Section 43C

disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961 in the hands of the assessee company and will be added to the total income of the assessee. 12. With the aforesaid observations of Ld. AO, it was the submission of Ld. Sr. DR that the decision of Ld. CIT(A) was based on the observation that, for applicability

M/S M/S GOYAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR,RAIPUR (CG) vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, 3(1),RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms of my aforesaid observations

ITA 17/BIL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 17/Rpr/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Goyal Construction Company Shop No.213-214, Ii Floor, Crystal Arcade, Lodhipara Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aaffg9964N .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-3(1), Raipur (C.G.). ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 4Section 80I

disallowances. 5. The assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before me. 5 M/s. Goyal Construction Company Vs. ITO-3(1), Raipur 6. As the assessee has assailed the validity of jurisdiction that was assumed by the A.O, i.e., ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur for framing the assessment vide his order