INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), RAIPUR vs. SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD SINGHANIA, RAIPUR
In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations
ITA 228/RPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur13 Jan 2023AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.228/Rpr/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Income Tax Officer-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Jagdish Prasad Singhania, 14, Singhania Sadan Main Road, Bazarpara, Ward-Tilda, Neora, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Ajkps0565M ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: S/Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal &For Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(4)
disallowed transportation/hiring charges of Rs.2,08,270/- (supra) booked by the assessee against the names of two transporters, viz. Shri Manoj Kumar
Singhania and Smt. Reema Singhania, but had not drawn any adverse inferences in respect of balance amount of transportation/hiring charges of Rs.1,22,95,088/- [ Rs.1,25,03,358/- (-) Rs.2,08,270/-]. On the basis of the aforesaid