SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD,BILASPUR(CG) vs. DY.. C.I.T.-1(1), BILASPUR(CG)

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

THE DY. CIT- CIR.-1(1),, BILASPUR(CG) vs. SOUTH EASTERN COALFILDS LTD.,, BILASPUR(CG)

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1(1)BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG) vs. THE SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LTD., BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG)

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

THE SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LTD., BILASPUR,BILASPUR(CG) vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE , 1(1)BILASPUR, BILASPUR(CG)

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), BILASPUR(CG) vs. SOUTH EASTERN COAL FIELDS LTD.,, BILASPUR(CG)

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. JT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), BILASPUR vs. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

3. Disallowance out of guest house For “furnishing inaccurate expenses particulars of income” 4. Disallowance of expenditure on assets For “concealment of not belonging to the assessee company income” 5. Disallowance of payment made to ESM For “furnishing inaccurate transporters particulars of income” 6. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the order passed by the A.O under Sec.271

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-2(1)BHILAI, BHILAI(CG) vs. M/S SMS SHIVNATH INFRASSTRUCTURE PVT LTD., DURG, DURG(CG)

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.87/Rpr/2017 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Acit-2(1), Bhilai Vs M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.107/Rpr/2016 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Vs Pr.Cit-2, Raipur Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

3) was after considering all the facts and materials W.r.t the return filed. The order of the Aa cannot be held to be prejudicial much less erroneous to the interest of revenue. It is settled law that section 263 20 ITA No.87/RPR/2017 & ITA No.107/RPR/2016 proceedings can be resorted to only in case of order passed by AO is erroneous

M/S SMS SHIVNATH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD,DURG(CG) vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.87/Rpr/2017 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Acit-2(1), Bhilai Vs M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.107/Rpr/2016 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Sms Shivnath Infrastructure Vs Pr.Cit-2, Raipur Pvt Ltd.,Toll Plaza, Near Dhamdhanaka, Durg. Pan No. :Aadcs 2258 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

3) was after considering all the facts and materials W.r.t the return filed. The order of the Aa cannot be held to be prejudicial much less erroneous to the interest of revenue. It is settled law that section 263 20 ITA No.87/RPR/2017 & ITA No.107/RPR/2016 proceedings can be resorted to only in case of order passed by AO is erroneous

VEER PROJECTS,RAIPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 654/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19)

Disallowances as discussed above u/s 68 of the Act and taxable at special Rate u/s 115BBE 1. Unsecured Loan 2,63,43,671 1. Sundry Creditors 2,56,47,012 Total assessed Income Rs.6,70,06,800 4. Aggrieved with the aforesaid additions, assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), however, the appeal of assessee has been dismissed

KAMLESH SHARMA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as above

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 70/Rpr/2026 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2020-21) Kamlesh Sharma, House No.109, Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Harihant Nagar, Sarona, Tax, Circle-1(1), Central Revenue Ring Road No.1, Raipur-492001, Cg Building, Civil Lines, Raipur-492001 Pan: Bppps4514C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : None (Adjournment Petition Filed) राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 20/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 06/03/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: This Appeal For Assessment Year (‘Ay’) 2020-21 Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 18.12.2025 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), [‘Cit(A)’], National Faceless Appeal Centre (‘Nfac’), Delhi Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’).

disallowance of Rs.9,19,253/-u/s Rs.9,19,253/- 10 5. Variation in respect of addition of Rs.1,10,00,000/- u/s 69 Rs.1,10,00,000/- 6. Variation in respect of addition of Rs. 30,497/- on account Rs 30,407/- of STCG 7. Total income/Loss determined Rs.1,62.46,830/- 4. Aggrieved with the reassessment order, the assessee filed

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.744/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Rajendra Kumar Shrivastava, Mig-42, Padmanabhpur, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan: Alops3921M

disallowed. It was further contended by the assessee that the amendment in Section 36(va) Explanation 1 and Explanation 2 amendment was from 01.04.2021 effective from A.Y.2022-23, hence, Explanation 2 is prospective amendment to provisions of Section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 43B of the Act vide Finance Act, 2021 by inserting Explanation 2 was prospective in nature and was applicable

GURMEET SINGH HORA,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 358, 359 & 360/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22)

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), all dated 17.03.2025, for the Assessment Year 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22, which in turn arises from the intimation issued u/s 143(1) of the Act, dated 14.07.2020, 24.12.2021 and 21.11.2022, respectively. Gurmeet Singh Hora vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-1(1) 2. Since

GURMEET SINGH HORA,RAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 358, 359 & 360/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22)

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), all dated 17.03.2025, for the Assessment Year 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22, which in turn arises from the intimation issued u/s 143(1) of the Act, dated 14.07.2020, 24.12.2021 and 21.11.2022, respectively. Gurmeet Singh Hora vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-1(1) 2. Since