BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “disallowance”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi746Mumbai708Bangalore433Jaipur120Ahmedabad104Hyderabad75Chennai71Kolkata70Nagpur53Pune52Indore34Lucknow28Ranchi26Allahabad26Rajkot24Agra20Surat12Dehradun12Karnataka12Raipur11Chandigarh11Jodhpur10Guwahati9Amritsar6Patna5Cochin5Jabalpur4Visakhapatnam3SC3Panaji2Varanasi2Kerala1Telangana1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 25011Section 1489Section 271(1)(c)8Section 43B6Section 153A5Section 148A5Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 234C

PAYAL VERMA (PROP. M/S JAI VRIDDHI TRADERS),BHILIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(3), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of my aforesaid observations

ITA 169/RPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 169/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Payal Verma M/S. Jai Vriddhi Traders, Ananj Mandi Line, Behind Nehru Bhawan, Supela Bhilai-490023 (C.G.) Pan : Aovpv3159G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Shyamsundar Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 43B

disallowance made under section 43B with respect to VAT payable of Rs. 25,06,246 and to compute total income and tax thereon accordingly. Ground no.4 — Excess levy of interest under section 234A

3
Penalty2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR vs. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD., RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 3/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2 & 3/Rpr/2023 Co Nos. 19 & 20/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.)

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K Meena, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance at the time of filing of the revised return of income could not have been summarily discarded. Also, we cannot remain oblivion of the fact that the assessee respectfully following the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Servies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT-1 (supra), had thereafter, in the assessment proceedings offered the aforementioned

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR vs. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD., RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2 & 3/Rpr/2023 Co Nos. 19 & 20/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17 & 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Raipur (C.G.)

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K Meena, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance at the time of filing of the revised return of income could not have been summarily discarded. Also, we cannot remain oblivion of the fact that the assessee respectfully following the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Servies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT-1 (supra), had thereafter, in the assessment proceedings offered the aforementioned

MICKEY SHRIVASTVA,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 122/RPR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur12 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member), SHRI ARUN KHODPIA (Accountant Member)

For Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 194C(5)Section 253Section 40a

234A, 234B and 234C at Rs. 8,50,565/- which is unjustified as the appellant never knew that above additions and disallowances will be made. 5. That the appellant craves leave to add, alter or modify the ground of appeal any time before or at the time of hearing of the appeal. 8. Further the assessee has filed additional ground

SMT. ANITA BANODHA ALIAS ANITA KATHGAR , ANITA AUTO, PONDI CHIRMIRI KOREA,KOREA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 230/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.230/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Smt. Anita Banodha Alias Anita Kathgar Anita Auto, Pondi, West Chirmiri, Korea (C.G)-497 449 Pan: Afgpj1876C ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Raipur-1(C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Sethia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raghunath, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowed u/s 37(1) of the Act. The above omission has led to under levy of tax including Cess of Rs.34,696/- and interest u/s 234a and 234B amounting to Rs.18,041/- and 20,817/- respectively. 7 Smt. Anita Banodha alias Anita Kathgar Vs. Pr. CIT, Raipur-1 Thus, aggregate under levy of tax and interest in this case arrives

SARTHAK ISPAT PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 513/RPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / It(Ss)A No. 14 & Ita Nos. 513, 514, 515, 516 & 517/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250

disallowance of Rs.6,34,30/- made by the A.O. on account of alleged commission @ I% of the alleged undisclosed sale. 5. For that the Ld. ClT(A) ought to have directed the A.O. to compute proper interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C

SARTHAK ISPAT PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 515/RPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / It(Ss)A No. 14 & Ita Nos. 513, 514, 515, 516 & 517/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250

disallowance of Rs.6,34,30/- made by the A.O. on account of alleged commission @ I% of the alleged undisclosed sale. 5. For that the Ld. ClT(A) ought to have directed the A.O. to compute proper interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C

SARTHAK ISPAT PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 516/RPR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / It(Ss)A No. 14 & Ita Nos. 513, 514, 515, 516 & 517/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250

disallowance of Rs.6,34,30/- made by the A.O. on account of alleged commission @ I% of the alleged undisclosed sale. 5. For that the Ld. ClT(A) ought to have directed the A.O. to compute proper interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C

SARTHAK ISPAT PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 514/RPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / It(Ss)A No. 14 & Ita Nos. 513, 514, 515, 516 & 517/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250

disallowance of Rs.6,34,30/- made by the A.O. on account of alleged commission @ I% of the alleged undisclosed sale. 5. For that the Ld. ClT(A) ought to have directed the A.O. to compute proper interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C

SARTHAK ISPAT PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 517/RPR/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / It(Ss)A No. 14 & Ita Nos. 513, 514, 515, 516 & 517/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2017-18, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 250

disallowance of Rs.6,34,30/- made by the A.O. on account of alleged commission @ I% of the alleged undisclosed sale. 5. For that the Ld. ClT(A) ought to have directed the A.O. to compute proper interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C

INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), RAIPUR, CIVIL LINES, RAIPUR vs. SMITA MUKESH KEDIA, RAIPUR

ITA 451/RPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 451/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri G. S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 44ASection 69C

disallowed from the trading account and should be added to the total income of the assessee. Ld. AO also added amounting to Rs.45,580/- u/s 69C of the Act, presuming that the commission would have paid by the assessee in cash to M/s Pratyush Steels for the aforesaid bogus transactions. With the aforesaid addition, assessed income of the assessee