BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai314Ahmedabad91Delhi86Cochin62Kolkata45Bangalore38Chennai34Chandigarh29Hyderabad18Jaipur11Indore11Surat10Cuttack7Raipur7Lucknow5Pune4Karnataka2Rajkot1Patna1Nagpur1Agra1Panaji1Kerala1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 43B20Section 143(1)6Disallowance5Addition to Income4Section 363Section 143(3)2Deduction2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), BHILAI vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by Revenue in the present appeal found to be squarely covered in favour of the assessee and thus the same are rejected

ITA 100/RPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.100/Rpr/2018 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 V. The Dcit-1(1) Shri Sandeep Surendran Bhilai Nair, Prop. M/S. Vasava Engineering Construction, 113-Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, Supela, Bhilai [Pan: Aczpn 2865 M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By Shri Makarand M. Joshi & Shri Aniruddha Kavimandan, Cas ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, : Sr. D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 22.08.2023 : घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 14.09.2023

Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 253Section 43B

disallowed in terms of Section 43B of the Act. Learned AR of the assessee submitted that such contention of the Department cannot be acceded to since the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court was pertaining to employee’s contribution towards PF/ESI and the same ratio cannot be applied in case of service tax liability. 9. Learned AR also relied upon

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VYAPAR vs. VISHAL AUTOMOBILES, TIFRA

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the department stands dismissed

ITA 383/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 383/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19) Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S Vishal Automobiles, Tifra Near Tax-1(1), 1St Floor, Shri Ram Plaza, Railway Crossing, Bilaspur Vypar Vihar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 495001, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aaffv0333C Co No. 16/Rpr/2025 (Arises Out Of Ita No: 383/Rpr/2025) M/S Vishal Automobiles, Tifra Near Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Railway Crossing, Bilaspur 495001, Lines, Raipur-492001, C.G. Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aaffv0333C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Vinod Kumar Khatri, Ca. राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 29.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 30.07.2025

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Khatri, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 438Section 43B

disallowance considering the amendment in section 145A. However, the Hon'ble High Court Chhattisgarh decided the issue as under- "12. Reverting

GANESHAN PURUSHOTHAMAN ACHARI,BHILAI, DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 147/RPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 146 To 148/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 To 2019-20 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari 116, Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Achpa6510E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cpc, Bengaluru. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 43B

section 145A were 6 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos.146 to 148/RPR/2022 either the subject matter or considered. Therefore, the ratio of these two case laws will have no application in the present case of the appellant for the elaborate reasons made hereinbefore. In this view of the matter, the action of the A.O in disallowing

GANESHAN PURUSHOTHAMAN ACHARI,BHILAI, DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 146/RPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 146 To 148/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 To 2019-20 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari 116, Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Achpa6510E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cpc, Bengaluru. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 43B

section 145A were 6 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos.146 to 148/RPR/2022 either the subject matter or considered. Therefore, the ratio of these two case laws will have no application in the present case of the appellant for the elaborate reasons made hereinbefore. In this view of the matter, the action of the A.O in disallowing

GANESHAN PURUSHOTHAMAN ACHARI,BHILAI, DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 148/RPR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 146 To 148/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 To 2019-20 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari 116, Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Achpa6510E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cpc, Bengaluru. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 43B

section 145A were 6 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos.146 to 148/RPR/2022 either the subject matter or considered. Therefore, the ratio of these two case laws will have no application in the present case of the appellant for the elaborate reasons made hereinbefore. In this view of the matter, the action of the A.O in disallowing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), BHILAI vs. M/S GANPATI MOTORS, , BHILAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 239/RPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur09 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 239/Rpr/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax -1(1), 32/32 Bungalows, Bhilai. Dist. Durg (C.G.)-490 006 .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. M/S. Ganpati Motors, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai-490 006. Pan : Aaefg6628E ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Assessee By : Shri S.R. Rao Revenue By : Shri R.P. Namdev

For Appellant: Shri S.R. RaoFor Respondent: Shri R.P. Namdev
Section 145ASection 43B

145A of the I.T.Act. 3. Whether in law and on facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in considering unpaid VAT and service Tax as allowable in contravention of section 43B of the I.T.Act, 1961. 4. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous both in law and on fact. 5. Any other ground

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX01(2), RAIPUR (CG) vs. M/S ISHWAR ISPAT INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 188/BIL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur15 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2009-2010

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Mrs Shabna Parveen, DR
Section 68

disallowed Rs,3,32,887- and added the same to the income of the assessee. 16. Before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that the Freight Payable Account is for the preceding year. Freight Liability provided in the accounts and paid during the year under consideration by debiting Freight Liability Account. The payments are not expenditure for the year