BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai325Delhi86Cochin59Kolkata45Bangalore41Ahmedabad35Chennai34Chandigarh29Hyderabad19Surat9Jaipur8Lucknow5Raipur5Pune4Indore4Karnataka2Cuttack1Kerala1Panaji1Patna1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 43B14Section 143(1)6Disallowance5Section 363Section 143(3)2Addition to Income2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1), BHILAI vs. SHRI SANDEEP SURENDRAN NAIR, BHILAI

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by Revenue in the present appeal found to be squarely covered in favour of the assessee and thus the same are rejected

ITA 100/RPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.100/Rpr/2018 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 V. The Dcit-1(1) Shri Sandeep Surendran Bhilai Nair, Prop. M/S. Vasava Engineering Construction, 113-Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, Supela, Bhilai [Pan: Aczpn 2865 M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By Shri Makarand M. Joshi & Shri Aniruddha Kavimandan, Cas ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, : Sr. D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 22.08.2023 : घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 14.09.2023

Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 253Section 43B

disallowed in terms of Section 43B of the Act. Learned AR of the assessee submitted that such contention of the Department cannot be acceded to since the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court was pertaining to employee’s contribution towards PF/ESI and the same ratio cannot be applied in case of service tax liability. 9. Learned AR also relied upon

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VYAPAR vs. VISHAL AUTOMOBILES, TIFRA

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the department stands dismissed

ITA 383/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur30 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 383/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19) Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income M/S Vishal Automobiles, Tifra Near Tax-1(1), 1St Floor, Shri Ram Plaza, Railway Crossing, Bilaspur Vypar Vihar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 495001, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aaffv0333C Co No. 16/Rpr/2025 (Arises Out Of Ita No: 383/Rpr/2025) M/S Vishal Automobiles, Tifra Near Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Railway Crossing, Bilaspur 495001, Lines, Raipur-492001, C.G. Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aaffv0333C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) .. िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Vinod Kumar Khatri, Ca. राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 29.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 30.07.2025

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Khatri, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 438Section 43B

disallowance considering the amendment in section 145A. However, the Hon'ble High Court Chhattisgarh decided the issue as under- "12. Reverting

GANESHAN PURUSHOTHAMAN ACHARI,BHILAI, DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 146/RPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 146 To 148/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 To 2019-20 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari 116, Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Achpa6510E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cpc, Bengaluru. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 43B

section 145A were 6 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos.146 to 148/RPR/2022 either the subject matter or considered. Therefore, the ratio of these two case laws will have no application in the present case of the appellant for the elaborate reasons made hereinbefore. In this view of the matter, the action of the A.O in disallowing

GANESHAN PURUSHOTHAMAN ACHARI,BHILAI, DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 147/RPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 146 To 148/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 To 2019-20 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari 116, Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Achpa6510E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cpc, Bengaluru. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 43B

section 145A were 6 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos.146 to 148/RPR/2022 either the subject matter or considered. Therefore, the ratio of these two case laws will have no application in the present case of the appellant for the elaborate reasons made hereinbefore. In this view of the matter, the action of the A.O in disallowing

GANESHAN PURUSHOTHAMAN ACHARI,BHILAI, DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 148/RPR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur27 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 146 To 148/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 To 2019-20 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari 116, Friends Arcade, Shastri Nagar, G.E. Road, Supela, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Achpa6510E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Cpc, Bengaluru. ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Tripathi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 36Section 43B

section 145A were 6 Ganeshan Puroshothaman Achari Vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru ITA Nos.146 to 148/RPR/2022 either the subject matter or considered. Therefore, the ratio of these two case laws will have no application in the present case of the appellant for the elaborate reasons made hereinbefore. In this view of the matter, the action of the A.O in disallowing