BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi112Mumbai87Chennai70Kolkata55Allahabad37Bangalore35Pune21Lucknow15Jaipur15Chandigarh14Indore9Surat8Patna8Ahmedabad7Raipur7Rajkot6Agra5Karnataka3Cochin2Amritsar2Jabalpur1Ranchi1Visakhapatnam1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 14721Section 26321Section 14821Section 17Section 148A7Reopening of Assessment7Limitation/Time-bar7Revision u/s 2637

SANKET JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 479/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record

SAMPAT LAL JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 478/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record

SMT. SUSHILA DEVI JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PCIT-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 235/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record

SMT. TILOTTAMA JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PCIT-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 236/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record

SANJOG JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 233/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record

SANJOG JHABAK L/H OF LATE GAUTAM CHAND JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAIPUR-1, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 234/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record

SMT. PUSHPA JHABAK, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. PCIT-1, RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the captioned assessees are allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 237/RPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
Section 1Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 263

disallowance of the aforesaid claim of deduction so raised by the assessee. 21. Aggrieved, the assessee has assailed before us the order passed by the Pr. CIT u/s. 263 of the Act, dated 18.10.2024. 22. We have heard the Ld. Authorized Representatives of both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record