BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 13Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi70Mumbai24Kolkata16Pune10Bangalore9Ahmedabad8Cuttack8Indore5Dehradun5Hyderabad5Rajkot3Jaipur2Chennai2Chandigarh2Patna2Amritsar2Raipur2Varanasi2Visakhapatnam2Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 109Deduction2Disallowance2

SHRI SHRI CHITTARANJAJ KUMAR,BHILAI(CG) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, BHILAI(CG)

ITA 149/BIL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.149/Rpr/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Shri Chittaranjan Kumar F-10, Chpl, Dreams Homes, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai (C.G.) Pan : Afqpk7571K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri R. B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

disallowance of Rs.48,310/- in his hands. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without any success. 5. The assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals) has carried the matter in appeal before us. 6. Controversy involved in the present appeal lies in a narrow compass i.e., as to whether

RAGHVENDRA SINGH THAKUR, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

The appeal is allowed

ITA 242/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.242/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 Raghvendra Singh Thakur, H.No.238, Sarona, Tatibandh, Raipur, 492001, Chhattisgarh Pan: Akbpt7616E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Veekas S. Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(14)(ii)Section 69rSection 80C

13A) disregarding the documentary evidences submitted in support of the aforesaid claim of the assessee, hence, it is prayed that the disallowance of Rs.32,385/- confirmed by the Learned CIT (Appeal) may kindly be deleted. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned AO has erred on facts and in law in disallowing the business