RANCHI FUELS, BALODA BAZAR, BHATAPARA,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BHATAPARA, BHATAPARA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee firm is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of the aforesaid observations
ITA 532/RPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.532/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Ranchi Fuels Limtara, Nandghat, Baloda Bazar-492 006 (C.G.) Pan: Aatfr0836L .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Bhatapara (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Veekaas S Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68
12A of the IT Act for registration and thereafter, due to delay in deciding the second application for registration and realising the mistake, he preferred appeal with a delay of 55
days, that is how the delay in filing the appeal has taken place.
This fact remained uncontroverted, as no counter-affidavit controverting the facts stated and cause shown
