BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

41 results for “condonation of delay”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai488Kolkata462Mumbai420Delhi313Ahmedabad259Bangalore188Hyderabad182Pune152Surat133Jaipur128Indore67Rajkot61Cochin60Chandigarh57Calcutta49Visakhapatnam48Lucknow47Amritsar45Raipur41Panaji40Nagpur40Patna35Agra20Cuttack19Allahabad16Jabalpur10Guwahati9Jodhpur7Dehradun5Varanasi5Ranchi3SC1Telangana1Orissa1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 6854Addition to Income35Section 143(3)29Section 14419Section 14717Section 25017Unexplained Cash Credit17Section 143(2)16Limitation/Time-bar

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER -1, RAIGARH, RAIGARH(CG) vs. SHRI SHRI PARMANAND GUPTA, RAIGARH, RAIGARH(CG)

ITA 82/BIL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 82/Rpr/2017 Co. No. 02/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 The Income Tax Officer-1, Raigarh (C.G.) .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Shri Parmanand Gupta, Alochan Agrawal, L/H. Of Late Shri Parmanand Gupta, Prop. M/S. Balaji Handloom, 19/48, Palace Road, Raigarh (C.G.) Pan : Afdpg4961L ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147

unexplained cash credits u/s. 68 of the Act. Accordingly, the CIT(Appeals) holding a conviction that the cash deposits in the bank accounts represented the sale proceeds of the assessee which were accounted by him in his books of account, thus, vacated the addition of Rs.5,22,81,663/- made by the A.O under

Showing 1–20 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

15
Cash Deposit13
Section 142(1)12
Section 14811

M/S PURVI FINVEST LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1),, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company being devoid and bereft of any merit is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 20/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131(1)(d)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

cash credit within the meaning of the said section. Accordingly, the A.O. vide his order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act dated 28.12.2016, after making the addition described above of Rs.121.88 crore (approx.) u/s.68 of the Act, brought the same to tax u/s 115BBE of the Act and determined the income of the assessee company at Rs.120.86 crore (approx

M/S TRIMURTHY FINVEST LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assesse company being devoid and bereft of any merit is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 19/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131(1)(d)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

cash credit within the meaning of the said section. Accordingly, the A.O. vide his order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act dated 28.12.2016, after making the addition described above of Rs.112.37 crore (approx.) u/s.68 of the Act, brought the same to tax u/s 115BBE of the Act and determined the income of the assessee company at Rs.111.19 crore (approx

EAST WEST FINVEST INDIA LIMITED,BILASPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), BILASPR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company being devoid and bereft of any merit is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 21/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpia

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Vijayvargiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri V.K Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131(1)(d)Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

cash credit within the 17 M/s. East West Finvest India Limited Vs.DCIT, Circle-1(1), Bilaspur meaning of the said section. Accordingly, the A.O. vide his order passed u/s. 143(3) of the Act dated 28.12.2016, after making the addition described above of Rs.120.71 crore (approx.) u/s.68 of the Act, brought the same to tax u/s 115BBE

RAMESHWAR THAKUR,DALLI RAJHARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), BHILAI, BHILAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 21/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.21/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Rameshwar Thakur Bharitola, Chipara, Dalli Rajhara (C.G.)-491 228 Pan : Adzpt6030H .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Bhilai (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Ms. Akansha Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

condoning the delay in filing of appeal before CIT(A). 5. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. CIT(A), NFAC erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.20,00,000/- made by the AO u/s 69A of the Act. 6. The appellant craves to add, alter or delete

INDO LAHRI BIO POWER LTD, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of the aforesaid observations

ITA 529/RPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.529/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Indo Lahri Bio Power Limited 38, Saheed Smarak Complex, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan : Aaaci9125K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Bikram Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 250Section 68

unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the I.T.Act, 1961 as the cash has been duly recorded in the books of accounts of the appellant. The addition made by the A.O. and sustained by the CIT-Appeal is unjustified, unwarranted and - at uncalled for. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT-Appeal has erred

SANDEEP KAUR GILL,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-3(4), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 267/RPR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 267 & 268/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Sandeep Kaur Gill 26/934, Shukla Colony, Raja Talab, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Adcpg7812K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(4), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

unexplained cash credit made by the A.O u/s. 68 of the Act. 17. Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Ld. Authorized Representative (for short ‘AR’) at the threshold of hearing of the appeal submitted that the present appeal involves a delay of 44 days. It was submitted by him that the delay in filing of the appeal had occasioned because the assessee

SANDEEP KAUR GILL,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-3(4), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 268/RPR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 267 & 268/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Sandeep Kaur Gill 26/934, Shukla Colony, Raja Talab, Raipur (C.G.)-492 001 Pan: Adcpg7812K .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(4), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

unexplained cash credit made by the A.O u/s. 68 of the Act. 17. Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Ld. Authorized Representative (for short ‘AR’) at the threshold of hearing of the appeal submitted that the present appeal involves a delay of 44 days. It was submitted by him that the delay in filing of the appeal had occasioned because the assessee

M/S. G.P. INFRAVENTURES ,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), RAIPUR

The appeal of the department stands disposed off

ITA 94/RPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No.76/Rpr/2020) (Assessment Year: 2015-16) Income Tax Officer Ward-1(4), V M/S G.P. Infraventures, 1St Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, S Shree Tower, Shankar Nagar, Central Revenue Building, Raipur (C.G.) Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aanfg6074B (अपीलाथ" /Applicant) : (""यथ" / Respondent) (Ita No.94/Rpr/2020) (Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S G.P. Infraventures, V Income Tax Officer-1(4), Shree Tower, Shankar Nagar, S Raipur Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aanfg6074B (अपीलाथ" /Applicant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 10.10.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of : 23.11.2023 7Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(3)Section 68

unexplained cash credits u/s68, when it was not the issue of 'limited scrutiny' assessment under CASS; it is in violation of CBDT Instruction No. 7/2014; No.20/2015; No.5 of 2016; Id AO cannot go beyond the issues mentioned in the reasons for selection of 'limited scrutiny' assessment under CASS; Id AO is barred from looking into unconnected/ independent issue(s) other

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4), RAIPUR vs. MESERS G P INFRAVENTURES, RAIPUR

The appeal of the department stands disposed off

ITA 76/RPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No.76/Rpr/2020) (Assessment Year: 2015-16) Income Tax Officer Ward-1(4), V M/S G.P. Infraventures, 1St Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, S Shree Tower, Shankar Nagar, Central Revenue Building, Raipur (C.G.) Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aanfg6074B (अपीलाथ" /Applicant) : (""यथ" / Respondent) (Ita No.94/Rpr/2020) (Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S G.P. Infraventures, V Income Tax Officer-1(4), Shree Tower, Shankar Nagar, S Raipur Raipur (C.G.) Pan: Aanfg6074B (अपीलाथ" /Applicant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Ila M. Parmar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 10.10.2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of : 23.11.2023 7Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ila M. Parmar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(3)Section 68

unexplained cash credits u/s68, when it was not the issue of 'limited scrutiny' assessment under CASS; it is in violation of CBDT Instruction No. 7/2014; No.20/2015; No.5 of 2016; Id AO cannot go beyond the issues mentioned in the reasons for selection of 'limited scrutiny' assessment under CASS; Id AO is barred from looking into unconnected/ independent issue(s) other

SHRI JAYANTILAL PATEL,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of aforesaid observations

ITA 94/RPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur23 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No. 94/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri Jayantilal Patel, Ring Road No.2, Bhanpuri, Raipur-492 001 Pan : Aeqpp9093L .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-2(2), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sakshi Gopal Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

unexplained cash credits in bank u/s.68 of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2), Raipur has been erred for passing an order u/s.143(3) of IT Act that is bad in law as well as fact.” 2. At the very outset of the hearing of the appeal, it transpires that the present appeal is time

NELSON YONA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 181/RPR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur29 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.181/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2011-12 Nelson Yona Near Shiv Mandir, Avanti Vihar, Raipur (C.G.)-492 006 Pan: Adbpy8725E .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer Ward-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 5Section 68

delay of 741 days involved in the captioned appeal is condoned. 4. That on merits as emanating from the assessment order, the assessee had deposited an amount of Rs.2 lacs in his bank account and since the source of such cash deposits remained unexplained, the A.O added the said amount u/s.68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER O F INCOME TAX, RAIPUR vs. BALAJEE LOHA PVT. LTD., RAIPUR

ITA 356/RPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 356/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Amit M. Jain, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri S. L. Anuragi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

unexplained cash credit received by the assessee in the guise of share capital and premium. 5. Per contra, Shri Bikram Jain, Authorized Representative (in short “Ld. AR”) representing the assessee submitted that Ld. CIT(A) had rightly, judiciously and according to settled principle of law have deliberated upon the issue and have decided the appeal in favor of the assessee

RAJU JHANGHEL, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 445/RPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 445 & 446/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16) Raju Janghel, C/E Beside Trivenia Vs Income Tax Officer-1(2), Office Of Houshal Pan Thela, Gudhiyari, Ito-1(2), Cr Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Agrpj0572D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 03.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 05.02.2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Yogesh Kumar Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 68

unexplained cash credit, being total credits in bank account; when the assessee has only earned commission about 0.15% to 0.20% of total credit entries of Rs. 16,54,79,650 in such bank account; the addition is liable to be deleted." 3. "The appellant craves leave, to add, urge, alter, modify or withdraw any grounds before or at the time

RAJU JHANGHEL, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 446/RPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 445 & 446/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16) Raju Janghel, C/E Beside Trivenia Vs Income Tax Officer-1(2), Office Of Houshal Pan Thela, Gudhiyari, Ito-1(2), Cr Building, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Agrpj0572D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 03.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 05.02.2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Yogesh Kumar Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 68

unexplained cash credit, being total credits in bank account; when the assessee has only earned commission about 0.15% to 0.20% of total credit entries of Rs. 16,54,79,650 in such bank account; the addition is liable to be deleted." 3. "The appellant craves leave, to add, urge, alter, modify or withdraw any grounds before or at the time

SUBHASH MURARKA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 176/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur10 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.176/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2017-18 Subhash Murarka C-1/85/186-R7, Swarnabhoomi, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pan: Aeqpm4578P .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)

delay of 520 days is hereby condoned and the matter is taken up as heard on merits. 8. The relevant facts as emanating from the assessment order are extracted as follows: “During the course of assessment proceedings it was seen that assessee has introduced Capital to the tune of Rs.1,94,50,000/- Assessee was asked to file the detail

SHRI OM PARSHVANATH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 22/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur04 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.22/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2013-14 Shri Om Parshvanath Developers Private Limited Nadi Road, Ganjpara, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan: Aamcs7665N

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

delay is not liable to be condoned. Order passed by Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous and illegal. 2. Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of Rs. 24,72,500/- made by AO on account of share capital received by the appellant treating it to be unexplained cash credit

JDS CAPITAL MARKETS PRIVATE LIMITED,JDS CHAMBERS RAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD -1(2), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 309/RPR/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur20 Jun 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.309/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jds Capital Markets Private Limited 6, Central Avenue, Choube Colony, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan: Aabcj0428P

For Appellant: None (Adjournment Application)For Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 250(6)Section 251(1)(a)Section 251(2)Section 68

unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Act. 3 JDS Capital Markets Private Limited Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Raipur (C.G.) 3. Further it is noted that when the matter reached before the first appellate authority, the Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC as evident from Paras 5.22 to 6, decided regarding condonation of delay

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's appeal in ITA No

ITA 280/RPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 280 & 281/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2012-13 Pradeep Kumar Singh C-1/2, Maruti Business Park, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Coups0118F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Mahawar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69

delay involved in filing both appeals is condoned. 7. I shall now deal with the grievance of the assessee appellant based on which he has assailed the order passed by the CIT(Appeals) in his case for AY 201-12 in ITA No.280/RPR /2023. 8. On the basis of AIR information that the assessee had during the year made cash

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's appeal in ITA No

ITA 281/RPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur19 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 280 & 281/Rpr/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2012-13 Pradeep Kumar Singh C-1/2, Maruti Business Park, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Coups0118F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Mahawar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69

delay involved in filing both appeals is condoned. 7. I shall now deal with the grievance of the assessee appellant based on which he has assailed the order passed by the CIT(Appeals) in his case for AY 201-12 in ITA No.280/RPR /2023. 8. On the basis of AIR information that the assessee had during the year made cash