BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80P(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune137Mumbai135Chennai126Bangalore81Panaji67Cochin36Raipur27Kolkata26Ahmedabad24Jaipur21Hyderabad17Nagpur15Delhi14Chandigarh13Visakhapatnam12Rajkot10Karnataka10Lucknow10Surat9Indore7Calcutta2SC1Guwahati1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)116Section 143(3)34Deduction27Addition to Income27Section 80P19TDS19Disallowance19Natural Justice19Section 80P(2)(d)

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, PACHEDA, ABHANPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAIPUR

ITA 114/RPR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.114/Rpr/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Village- Pacheda, Block-Abhanpur, Chhatisgarh-493 661 Pan : Aaaag9886H .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-1(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri G.S. Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.N Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 251(2)Section 80P(1)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

c)(ii) which kindly be allowed. 6. That under the facts and the law, Ld. CIT (Appeals), NFAC (Delhi) further erred in confirming the Order of the Ld. AO by not allowing deduction of dividend income at Rs.80,732/- which is deductible u/s 80P(2)(d). Prayed to allow the same.” 2. As the present appeal is time barred

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 2508
Limitation/Time-bar8

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAUNA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 203/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAUNA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 204/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 207/RPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 208/RPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 205/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKRI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHARSIWA,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 202/RPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, LAWAN,BALODA BAZAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHATAPARA, BALODA BAZAR

ITA 206/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: None (Written Submissions)For Respondent: Shri Satya Prakash Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

delay and condone the same. 5 Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit ITA No. 202/RPR/2023 & 6 others 4. Briefly stated, the assessee which is a primary agricultural co- operative society engaged in the business of banking, paddy procurement, sale of fertilizer, seeds, manures and pesticides as well as sale of controlled items under the Public Distribution System

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, KODEBOD,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 330/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, KODEBOD,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 331/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, DOMA,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 332/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, DOMA,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 333/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, DOMA,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 334/RPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, DOMA,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 335/RPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, BHAKHARA, KURUD,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 336/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, SANKARDAH,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 326/RPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, KOSMARRA,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 324/RPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, SANKARDAH,DHAMTARI vs. INOCME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 327/RPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, KURUD,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 323/RPR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority

GRAMIN SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI, MADELI,DHAMTARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHAMTARI, DHAMTARI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee society in ITA No

ITA 325/RPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur05 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Dhody, CAFor Respondent: Shri Saty
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

80P of the Act. 6. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(Appeals) but without success. As is discernible from the records, the assessee society despite having been given sufficient opportunity had failed to avail the same and did not put up an appearance in the course of the proceedings before the first appellate authority