CHHATTISGARH RAJYA OPEN SCHOOL,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 16 & 17/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2019-20 & 2020-21 Chhattisgarh Rajya Open School Madhyamik Siksha Mandal, Pension Road, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan : Aaagc0179F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Bhopal. ……""यथ" / Respondent

Section which states as under: " Provided also that in case the fund or trust or institution or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in the first proviso makes an application on or after the 1st day of June, 2006 for the purpose of grant of exemption or continuance thereof, such application

CHHATTISGARH RAJYA OPEN SCHOOL,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 16 & 17/Rpr/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2019-20 & 2020-21 Chhattisgarh Rajya Open School Madhyamik Siksha Mandal, Pension Road, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan : Aaagc0179F .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Bhopal. ……""यथ" / Respondent

Section which states as under: " Provided also that in case the fund or trust or institution or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in the first proviso makes an application on or after the 1st day of June, 2006 for the purpose of grant of exemption or continuance thereof, such application

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.744/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Rajendra Kumar Shrivastava, Mig-42, Padmanabhpur, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan: Alops3921M

72[*] 73[Commissioner (Appeals)), by the 74[Assessing] Officer also. SECTION 154 (7) -Save as otherwise provided in section 155 or sub-section (4) of section 18685 no amendment under this section shall be made after the expiry of four years 86[ from the end of the financial year in which the order87 sought to be amended was passed.] SECTION

ASHOK KUMAR WADHWANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.117 &118/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 & 2016-17 Ashok Kumar Wadhwani, Ujwal Udyog, Sinodha, Neora, Tilda, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aahpw1400B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

delay of 597 days has been condoned and the matter remanded back to this Bench based on similar observation vide order dated 10.03.2025 in Tax Case No. 209/2024. The same is only referred to and not extracted for the sake of brevity. 4. Regarding merits, the parties herein submitted that the facts, circumstances and the issues involved in both these

ASHOK KUMAR WADHWANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.117 &118/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2014-15 & 2016-17 Ashok Kumar Wadhwani, Ujwal Udyog, Sinodha, Neora, Tilda, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pan: Aahpw1400B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

delay of 597 days has been condoned and the matter remanded back to this Bench based on similar observation vide order dated 10.03.2025 in Tax Case No. 209/2024. The same is only referred to and not extracted for the sake of brevity. 4. Regarding merits, the parties herein submitted that the facts, circumstances and the issues involved in both these

SHRI OM PARSHVANATH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), BHILAI, DURG

In the result, appeal of the assessee company is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.22/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2013-14 Shri Om Parshvanath Developers Private Limited Nadi Road, Ganjpara, Durg (C.G.)-491 001 Pan: Aamcs7665N

72,500/-. 5. The assessee being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(Appeals)/NFAC has carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the CIT(Appeals)/NFAC had dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine on the ground of limitation having stated that the appeal

DAS PROCESSORS,RAJNANDGAON,RAJNANDGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1 RAJNANDGAON, RAJNANDGAON

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as above

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 780/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2018-19) Das Processors, 44 Vardhman Nagar Vs Income Tax Officer-1 Jain School Road, Rajnandgaon, Rajnandgaon, Fci Road, Chhattisgarh-491441 Near Raipur Naka Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh-491441 Pan: Aaifd6768Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : None. राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/03/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 12/03/2026 Pronouncement

condoning the delay in filing the appeal and affording reasonable opportunity of being heard. Further, the Ld. CIT(A) 1 Das Processors vs. ITO-1, Rajnandgaon did not decide the appeal on merit. The assessee has also raised the issue that the Ld. Assessing Officer (‘AO’) has not carried out the requisite enquiries/investigation/ verification as directed by the Ld. Principal

DOLPHIN PROMOTERS & BUILDERS, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RAIPUR

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 440/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2014-15)

section 144B of the Act was completed on 28.03.2022, with disallowance of Rs.72,72,000/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), which was dismissed on an ex-parte basis. 5. Dissatisfied with the aforesaid order of Ld. CIT(A), the assessee preferred an appeal

ANIL NACHRANI,RAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No. 47/Rpr/2022) (Assessment Year: 2012-13)

72 - 79 of Limited vs. PCIT-I, 479/PUN/2017 Bench LPB-I Aurangabad 6.1 (c) The Learned PCIT (Central), Bhopal contended that the return filed by the assessee in response to the notice u/s 148 was non-Est return as the same was filed after the expiry of time limit stipulated in the notice u/s 148, there is no merit

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR vs. MANAV MOTORS, RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is disposed-off, in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am (Ita No. 151/Rpr/2022) (Assessment Year: 2017-18)

delay in filing of the appeal has been condoned in terms of provisions of section 253(5). 3. The brief fact of the case borne from the records are that the assessee firm has filed its return of income for the AY 2017-18 on 19.09.2017 declaring of total income of Rs. 42,92,380/- Subsequently, the case

RADHA MISHRA,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.509/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Radha Mishra C/O. Kunj Bihari Mishra, Opp. D.P. Vipra Law College, Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur-495 001 (C.G.) Pan: Bzspm0698G .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

delay of 34 days in filing of the present appeal, therefore, the same considering the totality of the facts merits to be condoned. 5. Controversy involved in the present appeal hinges around in a narrow compass i.e. as to whether or not the A.O was justified in law and facts of the case in treating the unexplained portion

MALANI HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed, in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 316/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2013-14)

section 251(1)(a) of the Act and failed to adjudicate on legal ground as well as on merits of the case as raised before him. 6. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. AO as well as CIT(A) erred in making an addition