BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai89Chennai50Hyderabad47Ahmedabad47Pune26Visakhapatnam23Jaipur20Surat19Indore19Kolkata18Delhi18Nagpur13Lucknow12Bangalore9Patna6Jabalpur6Rajkot4Agra4Jodhpur3Chandigarh2Varanasi2Raipur2Allahabad1Cochin1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 69A2Addition to Income2Condonation of Delay2

YOGESH KUMAR VERMA, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-4(5), RAIPUR, RAIPUR

ITA 305/RPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur02 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 305/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 50C(2)

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), dated 28.03.2024, for the Assessment Year 2014-15, which in turn arises from the assessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act, dated 30.12.2018, passed by Income Tax Officer-4(5), Raipur (in short “Ld. AR”). 2 Yogesh Kumar Verma vs. ITO-4(5), Raipur

SMT BUDHAREEN BAI,BHATAPARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,, BHATAPARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 157/RPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur14 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaassessment Year : 2014-15 Smt. Budhia Reen Bai, Ito, Near Shitala Mandir, Bhatapara (Cg). Hathanipara Ward, Vs. Bhatapara (Cg) – 493118. Pan : Bxxpb0771Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vikash Sharma, Adv. Department By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 13-05-2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 14-05-2019 O R D E R Per Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Am :

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 223(2)Section 44ASection 55Section 69A

delay should be condoned and proceed to adjudicate the issue on merits. 4. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned AO has erred on facts and in law in making addition of Rs.55,38,000/- by invoking the provisions of Section