SHRI CHANKI RAMWANI, RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms of the aforesaid observations
ITA 551/RPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 Jan 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Ravish Soodआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.551/Rpr/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Shri Chanki Ramwani, Plot No.11/12, Phase-I/Ii, Shri Ram Nagar, Shankar Nagar, Raipur-492 001 (C.G.) Pan: Anypr6711J .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Sakshi Gopal Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)
condone the impugned delay of 152 days (as pointed out by the registry) in filing of the present appeal by the assessee.
8. Succinctly stated, the assessee who is engaged in the business of transportation had e-filed his return of income for A.Y.2016-17 on 27.02.2017, declaring an income of Rs.8,68,430/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee
