Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 282A(1)7 Section 133(6)6 Section 1485 TDS5 Addition to Income5 Limitation/Time-bar5 Section 271D4 Reassessment4 Condonation of Delay

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 33/RPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.33/Rpr/2018 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) M/S Radhe Shyam Beni Shyam Vs Ito, Ward-1(2), Bilaspur Kesary & Company, Dayalband, Nariyal Kothi, Bilaspur (C.G.) Pan No. : Aahfr 1307 G (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Tiwari & Mrs. SummedhaFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR

Section 269SSection 271Section 271D

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and appeal is heard finally. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of cement hume pipe and cement product and filed its return of income on 30.09.2009 electronically declaring total income at Rs.2,04,950/-. Thereafter the AO completed

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

RAMAN VASU THACHISARIL, KOLLAM, KOLLAM vs. ITO, WARD- JAGDALPUR, JAGDALPUR

MANOJ KUMAR SAHU, DURG,DURG vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), BHILAI, DURG

NEELAM CHANDRAKAR, RAJNANDGAON,RAJNANDGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), BHILAI, DURG

LEELADHAR CHANDRAKAR, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BHILAI, DURG

LEELADHAR CHANDRAKAR, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 (3), BHILAI, DURG