Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 292clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 41(1)5 Section 143(3)4 Section 271(1)(c)3 Addition to Income3 Section 80P(2)2 Section 80P(2)(d)2 Section 143(2)2 Section 69C2

A.C.STRIPS PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 53/RPR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur06 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 53/Rpr/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 A.C Strips Pvt. Ltd. 20, New Cloth Market, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) Pan : Aacca0568N .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax-3(1) Raipur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R.B Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Choudhary N.C. Roy, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

delay involved in filing of the present appeal and condone the same. 3. Succinctly stated, the assessee company which is engaged in the business of running a rolling mill had e-filed its return of income for the A.Y.2013-14 on 30.09.2013, declaring an income of Rs.49,10,790/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment u/s.143

A.C.STRIPS PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAIPUR

A.C.STRIPS PRIVATE LIMITED,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), RAIPUR

SHRI SWAPNIL KUMAR JAIN,CHAMPA (CG) vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- JANJGIR, CHAMPA,

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, DHORRA,GARIYABAND vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), RAIPUR