BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 279(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai172Karnataka103Chandigarh65Mumbai61Delhi28Kolkata28Bangalore19Jaipur16Cochin13Cuttack10Pune10Hyderabad8Ahmedabad7Patna7Nagpur7Surat6Lucknow4SC3Visakhapatnam2Amritsar2Indore2Jodhpur2Raipur2Agra1Rajasthan1Guwahati1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 80I3Section 249(3)2

DY. C.I.T.1(2), RAIPUR (CG) vs. M/S GODAWARI POWER & ISPAT LTD.,, RAIPUR (CG)

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 365/BIL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur01 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year : 2011-12 Dcit- 1(2), Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd., Raipur (Cg). Plot No.482/2, Industrial Growth Vs. Centre, Phase- 1, Siltara, Raipur (Cg).

For Appellant: Shri R. B. Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Mishra, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 3Section 80Section 80I

279/- as eligible profit of unit- 1 for the claim of deduction u/s 80-IA of the Act. It was submitted that the assessee company has earned the VER Credit (hereinafter referred to as “Carbon Credit”) from the installation of the Waste Heat Recovery Boiler (‘WHRB’) in eligible unit- 1 for use in the generation of Power. The assessee

RAJENDRA KUMAR SAPRE, BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. ITO-2(1), BILASPUR, BILASPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 482/RPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur26 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.482/Rpr/2025 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2016-17 Rajendra Kumar Sapre, Ward No.7, Shiwa Chowk, Post-Tifra, Bilaspur (C.G.) Pan: Cqips0419R .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Income Tax Officer-2(1), Bilaspur (C.G.) ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Birendra Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 249Section 249(3)Section 250Section 250(6)Section 251(1)(a)Section 251(2)

279 days. The assessee had explained before the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC that he being ignorant of the legal process relating to the Income Tax proceedings, such delay had occasioned and there was no assistant to him who could guide him in such matter. The Ld. CIT(Appeals)/NFAC was of the view that ignorance of law cannot be an excuse