BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune28Jaipur24Karnataka21Mumbai18Delhi17Kolkata17Ahmedabad15Chennai13Bangalore12Cochin8Visakhapatnam7Hyderabad7Rajkot6Nagpur5Amritsar4Indore3Surat3Agra3Raipur2Guwahati1SC1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271D5Section 269S2Section 2712Penalty2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

M/S RADHE SHYAM BENI SHYAM KESARY & COMPANY,BILASPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICDRF, WARDF 1(2), BILASPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 33/RPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.33/Rpr/2018 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) M/S Radhe Shyam Beni Shyam Vs Ito, Ward-1(2), Bilaspur Kesary & Company, Dayalband, Nariyal Kothi, Bilaspur (C.G.) Pan No. : Aahfr 1307 G (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Nitish Tiwari & Mrs. SummedhaFor Respondent: Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR
Section 269SSection 271Section 271D

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and appeal is heard finally. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of cement hume pipe and cement product and filed its return of income on 30.09.2009 electronically declaring total income at Rs.2,04,950/-. Thereafter the AO completed

VINEET SINGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT. LTD., BILASPUR,BILASPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, BILASPUR, BILASPUR

ITA 239/RPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur18 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No: 239/Rpr/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri Nikhilesh Begani, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 269SSection 271DSection 275

section 271D of the Income-tax Act,1961, for which there is no satisfaction recorded in the assessment order. 4. The impugned order is bad in law and on facts. 5. The appellant reserves the right to add, alter or omit all or any of the grounds of appeal in the interest of justice. 3. At the inception